unplugged-vendor/prebuilts/xcc/linux-x86/xtensa/RI-2018.0-linux/XtensaTools/info/gprof.info

2110 lines
93 KiB
Plaintext
Raw Blame History

This file contains invisible Unicode characters

This file contains invisible Unicode characters that are indistinguishable to humans but may be processed differently by a computer. If you think that this is intentional, you can safely ignore this warning. Use the Escape button to reveal them.

This is gprof.info, produced by makeinfo version 4.8 from
/home/xpgcust/tree/RI-2019.1/ib/p4root/Xtensa/Software/binutils/gprof/gprof.texi.
10/2018
Copyright (C) 1988, 1992, 1997, 1998, 1999, 2000, 2001, 2003, 2007,
2008, 2009 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
Copyright (C) 1999-2009 Tensilica, Inc.
Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document
under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.3 or
any later version published by the Free Software Foundation; with no
Invariant Sections, with no Front-Cover Texts, and with no Back-Cover
Texts. A copy of the license is included in the section entitled "GNU
Free Documentation License".
This publication is provided "AS IS." Tensilica, Inc. (hereafter
"Tensilica") does not make any warranty of any kind, either expressed
or implied, including, but not limited to, the implied warranties of
merchantability and fitness for a particular purpose. Information in
this document is provided solely to enable system and software
developers to use Tensilica(R) processors. Unless specifically set
forth herein, there are no express or implied patent, copyright or any
other intellectual property rights or licenses granted hereunder to
design or fabricate Tensilica integrated circuits or integrated
circuits based on the information in this document. Tensilica does not
warrant that the contents of this publication, whether individually or
as one or more groups, meets your requirements or that the publication
is error-free. This publication could include technical inaccuracies
or typographical errors. Changes may be made to the information
herein, and these changes may be incorporated in new editions of this
publication.
The following terms are trademarks or registered trademarks of
Tensilica, Inc.: FLIX, OSKit, Sea of Processors, Tensilica, Vectra,
Xplorer, XPRES, and Xtensa. All other trademarks and registered
trademarks are the property of their respective companies.

File: gprof.info, Node: Top, Next: Revisions, Up: (dir)
GNU Profiler User's Guide
*************************
This manual describes the GNU profiler, `gprof', and how you can use it
to determine which parts of a program are taking most of the execution
time. We assume that you know how to write, compile, and execute
programs. GNU `gprof' was written by Jay Fenlason.
This document is distributed under the terms of the GNU Free
Documentation License version 1.3. A copy of the license is included
in the section entitled "GNU Free Documentation License".
* Menu:
* Revisions:: Changes from previous versions.
* Introduction:: What profiling means, and why it is useful.
* Compiling:: How to compile your program for profiling.
* Executing:: Executing your program to generate profile data
* Invoking:: How to run `gprof', and its options
* Output:: Interpreting `gprof''s output
* Inaccuracy:: Potential problems you should be aware of
* GNU Free Documentation License:: GNU Free Documentation License
* History:: History of this document

File: gprof.info, Node: Revisions, Next: Introduction, Prev: Top, Up: Top
Changes from Previous Versions
******************************
The following changes were made for version 14 of the Xtensa Tools:
* Upgraded from version 2.18 to version 2.20 of the GNU Binary
Utilities.

File: gprof.info, Node: Introduction, Next: Compiling, Prev: Revisions, Up: Top
1 Introduction to Profiling
***************************
Profiling allows you to learn where your program spent its time and
which functions called which other functions while it was executing.
This information can show you which pieces of your program are slower
than you expected, and might be candidates for rewriting to make your
program execute faster. It can also tell you which functions are being
called more or less often than you expected. This may help you spot
bugs that had otherwise been unnoticed.
Since the profiler uses information collected during the actual
execution of your program, it can be used on programs that are too
large or too complex to analyze by reading the source. However, how
your program is run will affect the information that shows up in the
profile data. If you don't use some feature of your program while it
is being profiled, no profile information will be generated for that
feature.
Tensilica supports two options for collecting profile information.
First, the Xtensa instruction set simulator (ISS) can directly generate
the profile data. This is the easiest, most accurate, and most
flexible option. If the profile data for your program needs to reflect
interactions with real hardware, or if the ISS profiling is too slow,
the second option is to profile your program running on a hardware
implementation of your system. Hardware profiling requires certain
Xtensa processor features, and it uses statistical sampling, which
makes the results less accurate. Other profiling tools may be
available from third-party operating system vendors.
Profiling with the Xtensa ISS has several advantages over hardware
profiling:
* You do not need to compile the Xtensa program with special options
(e.g., `-hwpg') before profiling it.
* There is no instrumentation code added to the Xtensa program, so
the profile results are not distorted by any extra code.
* The Xtensa ISS can easily record the execution of every
instruction, so there is no need to rely on statistical
approximations like PC-sampling.
* Instead of counting execution cycles, the Xtensa ISS can optionally
record profile data for other events, such as cache misses. You
can then use `xt-gprof' or Xplorer to view a profile of these
other events.
Hardware profiling also imposes certain requirements on your Xtensa
system. The processor must include the Xtensa Debug Option, so that it
can send the profile data back to a host system via the On-Chip
Debugging (OCD) interface connected to the GNU Debugger (GDB). A
dedicated Xtensa timer, preferably with a dedicated interrupt level, is
required to control the PC sampling. For more information, please see
the description of hardware profiling in the `Xtensa Software
Development Toolkit User's Guide'.
Regardless of whether you use the ISS or hardware profiling,
Tensilica's `xt-gprof' uses a custom file format for the profile data.
This allows profiling of discontiguous text regions and avoids
inaccuracies related to combining the execution counts for adjacent
instructions.
Profiling has several steps:
* You must compile and link your program. Depending on whether you
are using the Xtensa ISS or hardware profiling, and depending on
what `gprof' options you want to use, you may need to specify
certain options to the compiler. *Note Compiling a Program for
Profiling: Compiling.
* You must execute your program to generate a profile data file.
*Note Executing the Program: Executing.
* You must run `xt-gprof' to analyze the profile data. *Note
`gprof' Command Summary: Invoking.
The next three chapters explain these steps in greater detail.
The profile data files may contain several kinds of data. One
section is a histogram of the events (cycle count, cache misses, etc.)
for each Xtensa instruction. Another section records the execution
count for each call-graph edge. The histogram counts and call-graph
edge counts are read and analyzed by `gprof'.
Several forms of output are available from the analysis.
The "flat profile" shows the total histogram counts for each
function, and how many times that function was called. If you simply
want to know which functions have the highest counts (i.e., which
functions burn most of the cycles, have the most cache misses, etc.),
it is stated concisely here. *Note The Flat Profile: Flat Profile.
The "call graph" shows, for each function, which functions called
it, which other functions it called, and how many times. There is also
an estimate of the histogram counts for the subroutines of each
function. This can suggest places where you might try to eliminate
function calls that use a lot of time. *Note The Call Graph: Call
Graph.
The "annotated source" listing is a copy of the program's source
code, labeled with the number of times each line of the program was
executed. *Note The Annotated Source Listing: Annotated Source.

File: gprof.info, Node: Compiling, Next: Executing, Prev: Introduction, Up: Top
2 Compiling a Program for Profiling
***********************************
For profiling with the Xtensa ISS, nothing special is required when
compiling your program. The profile data is collected by the ISS, so
no instrumentation code needs to be added to your program. You may
want to compile with `-g' to collect debugging information, which is
used for line-by-line profiling. *Note Line-by-line Profiling:
Line-by-line.
For Tensilica's hardware profiling, the first step in generating
profile information for your program is to compile and link it with
profiling enabled.
To compile a source file for profiling, specify the `-hwpg=N' option
when you run the compiler, where N is the timer number used for
profiling. (This is in addition to the options you normally use.)
To link the program for profiling, use the XCC compiler to do the
linking and simply specify `-hwpg=N' in addition to your usual options.
The same option, `-hwpg', alters either compilation or linking to do
what is necessary for profiling. Here are examples:
xt-xcc -g -c myprog.c utils.c -hwpg=1
xt-xcc -o myprog myprog.o utils.o -hwpg=1
The `-hwpg' option also works with a command that both compiles and
links:
xt-xcc -o myprog myprog.c utils.c -g -hwpg=1
Note: If the `-hwpg' option is not part of your compilation options,
but only your link options, you will avoid adding instrumentation code
to your program, but no call-graph data will be gathered and when you
run `gprof' you will get an error message like this:
xt-gprof: gmon.out file is missing call-graph data
If you add the `-Q' switch to suppress the printing of the call
graph data you will still be able to see the time samples:
Flat profile:
self total
cumulative self cycles cycles
% cycles cycles calls /call /call name
(K) (K) (K) (K)
44.12 7.69 7.69 zazLoop
35.29 13.84 6.15 main
20.59 17.42 3.59 bazMillion
If you compile only some of the modules of the program with `-hwpg',
you can still profile the program, but you won't get complete
information about the modules that were compiled without `-hwpg'. The
only information you get for the functions in those modules is the
total time spent in them; there is no record of how many times they
were called, or from where. This will not affect the flat profile
(except that the `calls' field for the functions will be blank), but
will greatly reduce the usefulness of the call graph.
If you wish to perform line-by-line profiling, you will also need to
specify the `-g' option, instructing the compiler to insert debugging
symbols into the program that match program addresses to source code
lines. *Note Line-by-line Profiling: Line-by-line.

File: gprof.info, Node: Executing, Next: Invoking, Prev: Compiling, Up: Top
3 Executing the Program
***********************
Once the program is compiled, you must run it in order to generate the
information that `gprof' needs. The way you run the program--the
arguments and input that you give it--may have a dramatic effect on
what the profile information shows. The profile data will describe the
parts of the program that were activated for the particular input you
use. For example, if the first command you give to your program is to
quit, the profile data will show the time used in initialization and in
cleanup, but not much else.
* Menu:
* Xtensa ISS:: Profiling with the Xtensa ISS
* Xtensa Hardware:: Collecting profile data from Xtensa hardware

File: gprof.info, Node: Xtensa ISS, Next: Xtensa Hardware, Up: Executing
3.1 Profiling with the Xtensa ISS
=================================
If you are profiling with the Xtensa instruction set simulator (ISS),
you can specify two kinds of options to the ISS profiling client:
* What events to profile: The default is to count the cycles spent
executing each instruction, but you can also profile other events
such as cache misses or pipeline interlocks.
* The output file name: This is the raw data file to be read by
`gprof'. If more than one kind of event is being profiled at the
same time, the name you specify is used as the base name and the
ISS appends a different suffix for each output file.
For example, to profile instruction cache misses and write the
results to a file named `misses.out', the ISS would be invoked with the
`--client_cmds="profile --icmiss misses.out"' option. Please see the
description of the `profile' client in the `Xtensa Instruction Set
Simulator (ISS) User's Guide' for more information about these options.
If you only want to profile cycle counts, you can simply invoke the
ISS with the `--profile=OUTFILE' option. This is equivalent to
`--client_cmds="profile OUTFILE"'. By default, `gprof' will expect the
profile information to be in a file called `gmon.out'. Therefore, it
is simplest to just use `--profile=gmon.out'.
If your program runs for a long time and you want to use the fast
functional simulation mode of the ISS (the `--turbo' option), you can
still collect profile data. Nothing special is required to profile
instruction counts (with `--client_cmds="profile --instructions"') in
this mode. Other kinds of profile data require statistical sampling,
using the `--sample' ISS option to periodically switch to the
cycle-accurate simulation mode. You can specify the `--sample_insns'
and `--sample_ratio' ISS options to control the size and frequency of
the cycle-accurate samples. The sampled results are automatically
extrapolated by the ISS to the fast functional portions of the
simulation. See the `Xtensa Instruction Set Simulator (ISS) User's
Guide' for more information.
Depending on the kinds of events you want to profile, you may need to
specify other ISS options. By default, the Xtensa ISS does not
simulate the memory system; all memory references are assumed to be in
cache. Use the `--mem_model' option if you want the cycle counts to
reflect the effects of caches and local memory. If you are profiling
cache misses, you will also need to use the `--mem_model' option.

File: gprof.info, Node: Xtensa Hardware, Prev: Xtensa ISS, Up: Executing
3.2 Xtensa Hardware Profiling
=============================
After compiling your program for hardware profiling, run it on the
hardware as you would normally debug it, using either `xt-gdb' or
`xplorer --debug'. When your program calls `exit', the debugger will
write the profile data to a file with a name composed of `gmon.out'
followed by a unique suffix. If your program does not call `exit', you
can interrupt it and use the debugger to call the
`xt_profile_save_and_reset' function, which will write out the profile
data. You can exit from the debugger after the profile data has been
written out. See the `Xtensa Software Development Toolkit User's
Guide' for details on using hardware profiling.

File: gprof.info, Node: Invoking, Next: Output, Prev: Executing, Up: Top
4 `gprof' Command Summary
*************************
After you have a profile data file `gmon.out', you can run `gprof' to
interpret the information in it. The `gprof' program prints a flat
profile and a call graph on standard output. Typically you would
redirect the output of `gprof' into a file with `>'.
You run `gprof' like this:
xt-gprof OPTIONS [EXECUTABLE-FILE [PROFILE-DATA-FILES...]] [> OUTFILE]
Here square-brackets indicate optional arguments.
If you omit the executable file name, the file `a.out' is used. If
you give no profile data file name, the file `gmon.out' is used. If
any file is not in the proper format, or if the profile data file does
not appear to belong to the executable file, an error message is
printed.
You can give more than one profile data file by entering all their
names after the executable file name; then the statistics in all the
data files are summed together.
The order of these options does not matter.
* Menu:
* Output Options:: Controlling `gprof''s output style
* Analysis Options:: Controlling how `gprof' analyzes its data
* Miscellaneous Options::
* Symspecs:: Specifying functions to include or exclude

File: gprof.info, Node: Output Options, Next: Analysis Options, Up: Invoking
4.1 Output Options
==================
These options specify which of several output formats `gprof' should
produce.
Many of these options take an optional "symspec" to specify
functions to be included or excluded. These options can be specified
multiple times, with different symspecs, to include or exclude sets of
symbols. *Note Symspecs: Symspecs.
Specifying any of these options overrides the default (`-p -q'),
which prints a flat profile and call graph analysis for all functions.
`-A[SYMSPEC]'
`--annotated-source[=SYMSPEC]'
The `-A' option causes `gprof' to print annotated source code. If
SYMSPEC is specified, print output only for matching symbols.
*Note The Annotated Source Listing: Annotated Source.
`-b'
`--brief'
If the `-b' option is given, `gprof' doesn't print the verbose
blurbs that try to explain the meaning of all of the fields in the
tables. This is useful if you intend to print out the output, or
are tired of seeing the blurbs.
`-C[SYMSPEC]'
`--exec-counts[=SYMSPEC]'
The `-C' option causes `gprof' to print a tally of functions and
the number of times each was called. If SYMSPEC is specified,
print tally only for matching symbols.
If you profile instruction counts (not cycles) with the Xtensa
ISS, that is, if you run ISS with `--client_cmds="profile
--instructions"', invoking `gprof' with the `-l' option, along
with `-C', will cause basic-block execution counts to be tallied
and displayed.
`-i'
`--file-info'
The `-i' option causes `gprof' to display summary information
about the profile data file(s) and then exit. The number of
histogram, call graph, and basic-block count records is displayed.
`-I DIRS'
`--directory-path=DIRS'
The `-I' option specifies a list of search directories in which to
find source files. Environment variable GPROF_PATH can also be
used to convey this information. Used mostly for annotated source
output.
`-J[SYMSPEC]'
`--no-annotated-source[=SYMSPEC]'
The `-J' option causes `gprof' not to print annotated source code.
If SYMSPEC is specified, `gprof' prints annotated source, but
excludes matching symbols.
`-L'
`--print-path'
Normally, source filenames are printed with the path component
suppressed. The `-L' option causes `gprof' to print the full
pathname of source filenames, which is determined from symbolic
debugging information in the image file and is relative to the
directory in which the compiler was invoked.
`-p[SYMSPEC]'
`--flat-profile[=SYMSPEC]'
The `-p' option causes `gprof' to print a flat profile. If
SYMSPEC is specified, print flat profile only for matching symbols.
*Note The Flat Profile: Flat Profile.
`-P[SYMSPEC]'
`--no-flat-profile[=SYMSPEC]'
The `-P' option causes `gprof' to suppress printing a flat profile.
If SYMSPEC is specified, `gprof' prints a flat profile, but
excludes matching symbols.
`-q[SYMSPEC]'
`--graph[=SYMSPEC]'
The `-q' option causes `gprof' to print the call graph analysis.
If SYMSPEC is specified, print call graph only for matching symbols
and their children. *Note The Call Graph: Call Graph.
`-Q[SYMSPEC]'
`--no-graph[=SYMSPEC]'
The `-Q' option causes `gprof' to suppress printing the call graph.
If SYMSPEC is specified, `gprof' prints a call graph, but excludes
matching symbols.
`-t'
`--table-length=NUM'
The `-t' option causes the NUM most active source lines in each
source file to be listed when source annotation is enabled. The
default is 10.
`-y'
`--separate-files'
This option affects annotated source output only. Normally,
`gprof' prints annotated source files to standard-output. If this
option is specified, annotated source for a file named
`path/FILENAME' is generated in the file `FILENAME-ann'. If the
underlying file system would truncate `FILENAME-ann' so that it
overwrites the original `FILENAME', `gprof' generates annotated
source in the file `FILENAME.ann' instead (if the original file
name has an extension, that extension is _replaced_ with `.ann').
`-Z[SYMSPEC]'
`--no-exec-counts[=SYMSPEC]'
The `-Z' option causes `gprof' not to print a tally of functions
and the number of times each was called. If SYMSPEC is specified,
print tally, but exclude matching symbols.
`-r'
`--function-ordering'
The `--function-ordering' option causes `gprof' to print a
suggested function ordering for the program based on profiling
data. This option suggests an ordering which may improve paging,
tlb and cache behavior for the program on systems which support
arbitrary ordering of functions in an executable.
The exact details of how to force the linker to place functions in
a particular order is system dependent and out of the scope of this
manual.
`-R MAP_FILE'
`--file-ordering MAP_FILE'
The `--file-ordering' option causes `gprof' to print a suggested
.o link line ordering for the program based on profiling data.
This option suggests an ordering which may improve paging, tlb and
cache behavior for the program on systems which do not support
arbitrary ordering of functions in an executable.
Use of the `-a' argument is highly recommended with this option.
The MAP_FILE argument is a pathname to a file which provides
function name to object file mappings. The format of the file is
similar to the output of the program `nm'.
c-parse.o:00000000 T yyparse
c-parse.o:00000004 C yyerrflag
c-lang.o:00000000 T maybe_objc_method_name
c-lang.o:00000000 T print_lang_statistics
c-lang.o:00000000 T recognize_objc_keyword
c-decl.o:00000000 T print_lang_identifier
c-decl.o:00000000 T print_lang_type
...
To create a MAP_FILE with GNU `nm', type a command like `nm
--extern-only --defined-only -v --print-file-name program-name'.
`-T'
`--traditional'
The `-T' option causes `gprof' to print its output in
"traditional" BSD style.
`-w WIDTH'
`--width=WIDTH'
Sets width of output lines to WIDTH. Currently only used when
printing the function index at the bottom of the call graph.
`-x'
`--all-lines'
This option affects annotated source output only. By default,
only the lines at the beginning of a basic-block are annotated.
If this option is specified, every line in a basic-block is
annotated by repeating the annotation for the first line. This
behavior is similar to `tcov''s `-a'.
`--demangle[=STYLE]'
`--no-demangle'
These options control whether C++ symbol names should be demangled
when printing output. The default is to demangle symbols. The
`--no-demangle' option may be used to turn off demangling.
Different compilers have different mangling styles. The optional
demangling style argument can be used to choose an appropriate
demangling style for your compiler.

File: gprof.info, Node: Analysis Options, Next: Miscellaneous Options, Prev: Output Options, Up: Invoking
4.2 Analysis Options
====================
`-a'
`--no-static'
The `-a' option causes `gprof' to suppress the printing of
statically declared (private) functions. (These are functions
whose names are not listed as global, and which are not visible
outside the file/function/block where they were defined.) Time
spent in these functions, calls to/from them, etc., will all be
attributed to the function that was loaded directly before it in
the executable file. This option affects both the flat profile
and the call graph.
`-c'
`--static-call-graph'
The `-c' option causes the call graph of the program to be
augmented by a heuristic which examines the text space of the
object file and identifies function calls in the binary machine
code. Since normal call graph records are only generated when
functions are entered, this option identifies children that could
have been called, but never were. Calls to functions that were
not compiled with profiling enabled are also identified, but only
if symbol table entries are present for them. Calls to dynamic
library routines are typically _not_ found by this option.
Parents or children identified via this heuristic are indicated in
the call graph with call counts of `0'.
`-D'
`--ignore-non-functions'
The `-D' option causes `gprof' to ignore symbols which are not
known to be functions. This option will give more accurate
profile data on systems where it is supported (Solaris and HPUX for
example).
`-f'
`--function-line'
The `-f' option enables line-by-line profiling where all the lines
for a function are grouped together in the flat profile.
Specifically, the flat profile entries are first sorted by
function in decreasing order of the histogram counts for the
function as a whole, and then sorted by line within each function,
again in decreasing order of histogram counts. Aside from the
order of the flat profile entries, this option is the same as the
`-l' option. The program must be compiled with a `-g' option so
that line number information is available.
`-k FROM/TO'
The `-k' option allows you to delete from the call graph any arcs
from symbols matching symspec FROM to those matching symspec TO.
`-K LOWPC:HIGHPC'
`--pc-range LOWPC:HIGHPC'
The `-K' option allows you to exclude profile data outside a
specific range of code. Histogram hits and call graph arcs with
addresses lower than LOWPC or higher than HIGHPC are simply
ignored. The addresses may be specified as decimal, hexadecimal or
octal values, with a `0' prefix for octal values or a `0x' prefix
for hexadecimal values. This option may be useful when analyzing
the performance of a region of code that would otherwise be
obscured by the rest of the program.
`-l'
`--line'
The `-l' option enables line-by-line profiling, which causes
histogram counts to be charged to individual source code lines,
instead of functions.
If you profile instruction counts (not cycles) with the Xtensa
ISS, that is, if you run ISS with `--client_cmds="profile
--instructions"', this option will also identify how many times
each line of code was executed. The program must be compiled with
a `-g' option so that line number information is available. While
line-by-line profiling can help isolate where in a large function
a program is spending its time, it also significantly increases
the running time of `gprof', and magnifies statistical
inaccuracies for hardware profiling. *Note Statistical Sampling
Error: Sampling Error.
`-m NUM'
`--min-count=NUM'
This option affects execution count output only. Symbols that are
executed less than NUM times are suppressed.
`-nSYMSPEC'
`--time=SYMSPEC'
The `-n' option causes `gprof', in its call graph analysis, to
only propagate times for symbols matching SYMSPEC.
`-NSYMSPEC'
`--no-time=SYMSPEC'
The `-n' option causes `gprof', in its call graph analysis, not to
propagate times for symbols matching SYMSPEC.
`-SFILENAME'
`--external-symbol-table=FILENAME'
The `-S' option causes `gprof' to read an external symbol table
file, such as `/proc/kallsyms', rather than read the symbol table
from the given object file (the default is `a.out'). This is useful
for profiling kernel modules.
`-z'
`--display-unused-functions'
If you give the `-z' option, `gprof' will mention all functions in
the flat profile, even those that were never called, and that had
no time spent in them. This is useful in conjunction with the
`-c' option for discovering which routines were never called.

File: gprof.info, Node: Miscellaneous Options, Next: Symspecs, Prev: Analysis Options, Up: Invoking
4.3 Miscellaneous Options
=========================
`-d[NUM]'
`--debug[=NUM]'
The `-d NUM' option specifies debugging options. If NUM is not
specified, enable all debugging.
`-h'
`--help'
The `-h' option prints command line usage.
`-ONAME'
`--file-format=NAME'
Selects the format of the profile data files. Recognized formats
are `auto' (the default), `bsd', `4.4bsd', `magic', and `prof'
(not yet supported).
`-s'
`--sum'
The `-s' option causes `gprof' to summarize the information in the
profile data files it read in, and write out a profile data file
called `gmon.sum', which contains all the information from the
profile data files that `gprof' read in. The file `gmon.sum' may
be one of the specified input files; the effect of this is to
merge the data in the other input files into `gmon.sum'.
Eventually you can run `gprof' again without `-s' to analyze the
cumulative data in the file `gmon.sum'.
`-v'
`--version'
The `-v' flag causes `gprof' to print the current version number,
and then exit.

File: gprof.info, Node: Symspecs, Prev: Miscellaneous Options, Up: Invoking
4.4 Symspecs
============
Many of the output options allow functions to be included or excluded
using "symspecs" (symbol specifications), which observe the following
syntax:
filename_containing_a_dot
| funcname_not_containing_a_dot
| linenumber
| ( [ any_filename ] `:' ( any_funcname | linenumber ) )
Here are some sample symspecs:
`main.c'
Selects everything in file `main.c'--the dot in the string tells
`gprof' to interpret the string as a filename, rather than as a
function name. To select a file whose name does not contain a
dot, a trailing colon should be specified. For example, `odd:' is
interpreted as the file named `odd'.
`main'
Selects all functions named `main'.
Note that there may be multiple instances of the same function name
because some of the definitions may be local (i.e., static).
Unless a function name is unique in a program, you must use the
colon notation explained below to specify a function from a
specific source file.
Sometimes, function names contain dots. In such cases, it is
necessary to add a leading colon to the name. For example,
`:.mul' selects function `.mul'.
In some object file formats, symbols have a leading underscore.
`gprof' will normally not print these underscores. When you name a
symbol in a symspec, you should type it exactly as `gprof' prints
it in its output. For example, if the compiler produces a symbol
`_main' from your `main' function, `gprof' still prints it as
`main' in its output, so you should use `main' in symspecs.
`main.c:main'
Selects function `main' in file `main.c'.
`main.c:134'
Selects line 134 in file `main.c'.

File: gprof.info, Node: Output, Next: Inaccuracy, Prev: Invoking, Up: Top
5 Interpreting `gprof''s Output
*******************************
`gprof' can produce several different output styles, the most important
of which are described below. The simplest output styles (file
information, execution count, and function and file ordering) are not
described here, but are documented with the respective options that
trigger them. *Note Output Options: Output Options.
* Menu:
* Flat Profile:: The flat profile shows how much time was spent
executing directly in each function.
* Call Graph:: The call graph shows which functions called which
others, and how much time each function used
when its subroutine calls are included.
* Line-by-line:: `gprof' can analyze individual source code lines
* Annotated Source:: The annotated source listing displays source code
labeled with execution counts
* Other Events:: Profiling events other than cycle counts.

File: gprof.info, Node: Flat Profile, Next: Call Graph, Up: Output
5.1 The Flat Profile
====================
The "flat profile" shows the total histogram counts for each function.
Unless the `-z' option is given, functions with no apparent counts and
no apparent calls to them, are not mentioned. Note that for hardware
profiling if a function was not compiled for profiling, and didn't run
long enough to show up on the program counter histogram, it will be
indistinguishable from a function that was never called. Also, if the
compiler optimizes a function call by inlining the function body, then
the function call will not be counted and the time spent in the inlined
function will be attributed to the caller. Line-by-line profiling may
be helpful in revealing the effects of inlined functions. *Note
Line-by-line Profiling: Line-by-line.
This is part of a flat profile for a small program:
Flat profile:
Each sample counts as 16384 cycles.
self total
cumulative self cycles cycles
% cycles cycles calls /call /call name
(K) (K) (K) (K)
66.67 49.15 49.15 7208 0.01 0.01 open
16.67 65.54 16.38 244 0.07 0.20 offtime
16.67 81.92 16.38 8 2.05 2.05 memccpy
16.67 98.30 16.38 7 2.34 2.34 write
0.00 98.30 0.00 236 0.00 0.00 tzset
0.00 98.30 0.00 192 0.00 0.00 tolower
0.00 98.30 0.00 47 0.00 0.00 strlen
0.00 98.30 0.00 45 0.00 0.00 strchr
0.00 98.30 0.00 1 0.00 98.30 main
0.00 98.30 0.00 1 0.00 0.00 memcpy
0.00 98.30 0.00 1 0.00 16.38 print
0.00 98.30 0.00 1 0.00 98.30 report
...
The functions are sorted first by decreasing run-time spent in them,
then by decreasing number of calls, then alphabetically by name.
`gprof' attempts to scale results so that the tables contain numbers
of reasonable magnitude. If the counts are scaled, the scaling factor
is shown at the top of the scaled columns. "T" indicates that the
values are in units of trillions; "G" indicates billions; "M" indicates
millions; and "K" indicates thousands.
For hardware profiling, where the profile data is sampled, you must
be careful interpreting the `gprof' results. Just before the column
headers, a statement appears indicating how many units each sample
counted as. This "sampling period" estimates the margin of error in
each of the figures. A figure that is not much larger than this is not
reliable. In this example, each sample counted as 16,384 cycles. The
program's total execution time was 98.30 Kcycles, as indicated by the
`cumulative cycles' field. Since each sample counted for 16,384
seconds, this means only six samples were taken during the run. Three
of the samples occurred while the program was in the `open' function,
as indicated by the `self cycles' field. Each of the other three
samples occurred once each in `offtime', `memccpy', and `write'. Since
only six samples were taken, none of these values can be regarded as
particularly reliable. In another run, the `self cycles' field for
`memccpy' might well be `0.00' or `32.77'. *Note Statistical Sampling
Error: Sampling Error, for a complete discussion.
The remaining functions in the listing (those whose `self cycles'
field is `0.00') didn't appear in the histogram samples at all.
However, the call graph indicated that they were called, so therefore
they are listed, sorted in decreasing order by the `calls' field.
Clearly some time was spent executing these functions, but the paucity
of histogram samples prevents any determination of how much time each
took.
Here is what the fields in each line mean (the UNITS depend on the
events being profiled, e.g., cycles, interlocks, etc.):
`%'
This is the percentage of the total histogram counts that are
attributed to this function. These should all add up to 100%.
`cumulative UNITS'
This is the cumulative total number of UNITS the computer spent
executing this function, plus the time spent in all the functions
above this one in this table.
`self UNITS'
This is the number of UNITS accounted for by this function alone.
The flat profile listing is sorted first by this number.
`calls'
This is the total number of times the function was called.
`self UNITS/call'
This represents the average number of UNITS spent in this function
per call.
`total UNITS/call'
This represents the average number of UNITS spent in this function
and its descendants per call. This is the only field in the flat
profile that uses call graph analysis.
`name'
This is the name of the function. The flat profile is sorted by
this field alphabetically after the "self UNITS" and "calls"
fields are sorted.

File: gprof.info, Node: Call Graph, Next: Line-by-line, Prev: Flat Profile, Up: Output
5.2 The Call Graph
==================
The "call graph" shows how much time was spent in each function and its
children. From this information, you can find functions that, while
they themselves may not have used much time, called other functions
that did use unusual amounts of time. Note that in the same way as the
flat profile, a function call inlined by the compiler will not be
visible in the call graph and the counts for the inlined function will
be attributed to the caller.
Here is a sample call from a small program. This call came from the
same `gprof' run as the flat profile example in the previous section.
index % self children called name
(K) (K)
<spontaneous>
[1] 100.0 0.00 98.30 _start [1]
0.00 98.30 1/1 main [2]
0.00 0.00 1/2 _atexit [28]
0.00 0.00 1/1 exit [59]
-----------------------------------------------
0.00 98.30 1/1 _start [1]
[2] 100.0 0.00 98.30 1 main [2]
0.00 98.30 1/1 report [3]
-----------------------------------------------
0.00 98.30 1/1 main [2]
[3] 100.0 0.00 98.30 1 report [3]
0.00 49.15 8/8 timelocal [6]
0.00 16.38 1/1 print [9]
0.00 16.38 9/9 fgets [12]
0.00 0.00 12/34 strncmp <cycle 1> [40]
0.00 0.00 8/8 lookup [20]
0.00 0.00 1/1 fopen [21]
0.00 0.00 8/8 chewtime [24]
0.00 0.00 8/16 skipspace [44]
-----------------------------------------------
[4] 60.5 16.38 49.15 8+472 <cycle 2 as a whole> [4]
16.38 49.15 244+260 offtime <cycle 2> [7]
0.00 0.00 236+1 tzset <cycle 2> [26]
-----------------------------------------------
As with the flat profile, `gprof' attempts to scale results so that
the tables contain numbers of reasonable magnitude. If the counts are
scaled, the scaling factor is shown at the top of the scaled columns.
"T" indicates that the values are in units of trillions; "G" indicates
billions; "M" indicates millions; and "K" indicates thousands.
The lines full of dashes divide this table into "entries", one for
each function. Each entry has one or more lines.
In each entry, the primary line is the one that starts with an index
number in square brackets. The end of this line says which function
the entry is for. The preceding lines in the entry describe the
callers of this function and the following lines describe its
subroutines (also called "children" when we speak of the call graph).
The entries are sorted by time spent in the function and its
subroutines.
* Menu:
* Primary:: Details of the primary line's contents.
* Callers:: Details of caller-lines' contents.
* Subroutines:: Details of subroutine-lines' contents.
* Cycles:: When there are cycles of recursion,
such as `a' calls `b' calls `a'...

File: gprof.info, Node: Primary, Next: Callers, Up: Call Graph
5.2.1 The Primary Line
----------------------
The "primary line" in a call graph entry is the line that describes the
function which the entry is about and gives the overall statistics for
this function.
For reference, we repeat the primary line from the entry for function
`report' in our main example, together with the heading line that shows
the names of the fields:
index % self children called name
...
[3] 100.0 0.00 98.30 1 report [3]
Here is what the fields in the primary line mean:
`index'
Entries are numbered with consecutive integers. Each function
therefore has an index number, which appears at the beginning of
its primary line.
Each cross-reference to a function, as a caller or subroutine of
another, gives its index number as well as its name. The index
number guides you if you wish to look for the entry for that
function.
`%'
This is the percentage of the total histogram counts that were
attributed to this function and to subroutines called from this
function.
The histogram hits for this function are counted again for the
callers of this function. Therefore, adding up these percentages
is meaningless.
`self'
This is the total number of histogram hits for this function. This
should be identical to the number printed in the `self' field for
this function in the flat profile.
`children'
This is the total number of histogram hits for subroutine calls
made by this function. This should be equal to the sum of all the
`self' and `children' entries of the children listed directly
below this function.
`called'
This is the number of times the function was called.
If the function called itself recursively, there are two numbers,
separated by a `+'. The first number counts non-recursive calls,
and the second counts recursive calls.
In the example above, the function `report' was called once from
`main'.
`name'
This is the name of the current function. The index number is
repeated after it.
If the function is part of a cycle of recursion, the cycle number
is printed between the function's name and the index number (*note
How Mutually Recursive Functions Are Described: Cycles.). For
example, if function `gnurr' is part of cycle number one, and has
index number twelve, its primary line would be end like this:
gnurr <cycle 1> [12]

File: gprof.info, Node: Callers, Next: Subroutines, Prev: Primary, Up: Call Graph
5.2.2 Lines for a Function's Callers
------------------------------------
A function's entry has a line for each function it was called by.
These lines' fields correspond to the fields of the primary line, but
their meanings are different because of the difference in context.
For reference, we repeat two lines from the entry for the function
`report', the primary line and one caller-line preceding it, together
with the heading line that shows the names of the fields:
index % self children called name
...
0.00 98.30 1/1 main [2]
[3] 100.0 0.00 98.30 1 report [3]
Here are the meanings of the fields in the caller-line for `report'
called from `main':
`self'
An estimate of the number of histogram hits for `report' itself
when it was called from `main'.
`children'
An estimate of the number of histogram hits for subroutines of
`report' when `report' was called from `main'.
The sum of the `self' and `children' fields is an estimate of the
number of histogram hits within calls to `report' from `main'.
`called'
Two numbers: the number of times `report' was called from `main',
followed by the total number of non-recursive calls to `report'
from all its callers.
`name and index number'
The name of the caller of `report' to which this line applies,
followed by the caller's index number.
Not all functions have entries in the call graph; some options to
`gprof' request the omission of certain functions. When a caller
has no entry of its own, it still has caller-lines in the entries
of the functions it calls.
If the caller is part of a recursion cycle, the cycle number is
printed between the name and the index number.
If the identity of the callers of a function cannot be determined, a
dummy caller-line is printed which has `<spontaneous>' as the "caller's
name" and all other fields blank. This can happen for signal handlers.

File: gprof.info, Node: Subroutines, Next: Cycles, Prev: Callers, Up: Call Graph
5.2.3 Lines for a Function's Subroutines
----------------------------------------
A function's entry has a line for each of its subroutines--in other
words, a line for each other function that it called. These lines'
fields correspond to the fields of the primary line, but their meanings
are different because of the difference in context.
For reference, we repeat two lines from the entry for the function
`main', the primary line and a line for a subroutine, together with the
heading line that shows the names of the fields:
index % self children called name
...
[2] 100.0 0.00 98.30 1 main [2]
0.00 98.30 1/1 report [3]
Here are the meanings of the fields in the subroutine-line for `main'
calling `report':
`self'
An estimate of the number of histogram hits directly within
`report' when `report' was called from `main'.
`children'
An estimate of the number of histogram hits in subroutines of
`report' when `report' was called from `main'.
The sum of the `self' and `children' fields is an estimate of the
total histogram hits in calls to `report' from `main'.
`called'
Two numbers, the number of calls to `report' from `main' followed
by the total number of non-recursive calls to `report'. This
ratio is used to determine how much of `report''s `self' and
`children' time gets credited to `main'. *Note Estimating
`children' Times: Assumptions.
`name'
The name of the subroutine of `main' to which this line applies,
followed by the subroutine's index number.
If the caller is part of a recursion cycle, the cycle number is
printed between the name and the index number.

File: gprof.info, Node: Cycles, Prev: Subroutines, Up: Call Graph
5.2.4 How Mutually Recursive Functions Are Described
----------------------------------------------------
The graph may be complicated by the presence of "cycles of recursion"
in the call graph. A cycle exists if a function calls another function
that (directly or indirectly) calls (or appears to call) the original
function. For example: if `a' calls `b', and `b' calls `a', then `a'
and `b' form a cycle.
Whenever there are call paths both ways between a pair of functions,
they belong to the same cycle. If `a' and `b' call each other and `b'
and `c' call each other, all three make one cycle. Note that even if
`b' only calls `a' if it was not called from `a', `gprof' cannot
determine this, so `a' and `b' are still considered a cycle.
The cycles are numbered with consecutive integers. When a function
belongs to a cycle, each time the function name appears in the call
graph it is followed by `<cycle NUMBER>'.
The reason cycles matter is that they make the time values in the
call graph paradoxical. The "time spent in children" of `a' should
include the time spent in its subroutine `b' and in `b''s
subroutines--but one of `b''s subroutines is `a'! How much of `a''s
time should be included in the children of `a', when `a' is indirectly
recursive?
The way `gprof' resolves this paradox is by creating a single entry
for the cycle as a whole. The primary line of this entry describes the
total time spent directly in the functions of the cycle. The
"subroutines" of the cycle are the individual functions of the cycle,
and all other functions that were called directly by them. The
"callers" of the cycle are the functions, outside the cycle, that
called functions in the cycle.
Here is an example portion of a call graph which shows a cycle
containing functions `a' and `b'. The cycle was entered by a call to
`a' from `main'; both `a' and `b' called `c'.
index % self children called name
----------------------------------------
1.77 0.00 1/1 main [2]
[3] 91.7 1.77 0.00 1+5 <cycle 1 as a whole> [3]
1.02 0.00 3 b <cycle 1> [4]
0.75 0.00 2 a <cycle 1> [5]
----------------------------------------
3 a <cycle 1> [5]
[4] 52.8 1.02 0.00 0 b <cycle 1> [4]
2 a <cycle 1> [5]
0.00 0.00 3/6 c [6]
----------------------------------------
1.77 0.00 1/1 main [2]
2 b <cycle 1> [4]
[5] 38.9 0.75 0.00 1 a <cycle 1> [5]
3 b <cycle 1> [4]
0 0.00 3/6 c [6]
----------------------------------------
(The entire call graph for this program contains in addition an entry
for `main', which calls `a', and an entry for `c', with callers `a' and
`b'.)
index % self children called name
<spontaneous>
[1] 100.0 0.00 1.93 0 start [1]
0.16 1.77 1/1 main [2]
----------------------------------------
0.16 1.77 1/1 start [1]
[2] 100.0 0.16 1.77 1 main [2]
1.77 0.00 1/1 a <cycle 1> [5]
----------------------------------------
1.77 0.00 1/1 main [2]
[3] 91.7 1.77 0.00 1+5 <cycle 1 as a whole> [3]
1.02 0.00 3 b <cycle 1> [4]
0.75 0.00 2 a <cycle 1> [5]
0.00 0.00 6/6 c [6]
----------------------------------------
3 a <cycle 1> [5]
[4] 52.8 1.02 0.00 0 b <cycle 1> [4]
2 a <cycle 1> [5]
0.00 0.00 3/6 c [6]
----------------------------------------
1.77 0.00 1/1 main [2]
2 b <cycle 1> [4]
[5] 38.9 0.75 0.00 1 a <cycle 1> [5]
3 b <cycle 1> [4]
0.00 0.00 3/6 c [6]
----------------------------------------
0.00 0.00 3/6 b <cycle 1> [4]
0.00 0.00 3/6 a <cycle 1> [5]
[6] 0.0 0.00 0.00 6 c [6]
----------------------------------------
The `self' field of the cycle's primary line is the total histogram
count for all the functions of the cycle. It equals the sum of the
`self' fields for the individual functions in the cycle, found in the
entry in the subroutine lines for these functions.
The `children' fields of the cycle's primary line and subroutine
lines count only subroutines outside the cycle. Even though `a' calls
`b', the time spent in those calls to `b' is not counted in `a''s
`children' time. Thus, we do not encounter the problem of what to do
when the time in those calls to `b' includes indirect recursive calls
back to `a'.
The `children' field of a caller-line in the cycle's entry estimates
the number of histogram hits _in the whole cycle_, and its other
subroutines, on the times when that caller called a function in the
cycle.
The `called' field in the primary line for the cycle has two numbers:
first, the number of times functions in the cycle were called by
functions outside the cycle; second, the number of times they were
called by functions in the cycle (including times when a function in
the cycle calls itself). This is a generalization of the usual split
into non-recursive and recursive calls.
The `called' field of a subroutine-line for a cycle member in the
cycle's entry says how many time that function was called from
functions in the cycle. The total of all these is the second number in
the primary line's `called' field.
In the individual entry for a function in a cycle, the other
functions in the same cycle can appear as subroutines and as callers.
These lines show how many times each function in the cycle called or
was called from each other function in the cycle. The `self' and
`children' fields in these lines are blank because of the difficulty of
defining meanings for them when recursion is going on.

File: gprof.info, Node: Line-by-line, Next: Annotated Source, Prev: Call Graph, Up: Output
5.3 Line-by-line Profiling
==========================
`gprof''s `-l' option causes the program to perform "line-by-line"
profiling. In this mode, histogram samples are assigned not to
functions, but to individual lines of source code. The program must be
compiled with a `-g' option to generate debugging symbols for tracking
source code lines.
The flat profile is the most useful output table in line-by-line
mode. The call graph isn't as useful as normal, since the current
version of `gprof' does not propagate call graph arcs from source code
lines to the enclosing function. The call graph does, however, show
each line of code that called each function, along with a count.
The `-f' option also enables line-by-line profiling. The only
difference between `-f' and `-l' is the order of the entries in the
flat profile. With `-f', the flat profile entries are grouped by
function so that all the lines for a function appear together. The
functions are shown in decreasing order of histogram counts, and the
lines within each function are also sorted in decreasing order of
histogram counts.
Here is a section of `gprof''s output, without line-by-line
profiling. Note that `ct_init' accounted for 13327 calls to
`init_block'.
Flat profile:
self total
cumulative self cycles cycles
% cycles cycles calls /call /call name
(K) (K) (K) (K)
30.77 0.13 0.04 6335 6.31 6.31 ct_init
Call graph (explanation follows)
index % self children called name
(K) (K)
0.00 0.00 1/13496 name_too_long
0.00 0.00 40/13496 deflate
0.00 0.00 128/13496 deflate_fast
0.00 0.00 13327/13496 ct_init
[7] 0.0 0.00 0.00 13496 init_block
Now let's look at some of `gprof''s output from the same program run,
this time with line-by-line profiling enabled. Note that `ct_init''s
histogram hits are broken down into four lines of source code--lines
349, 351, 382 and 385. In the call graph, note how `ct_init''s 13327
calls to `init_block' are broken down into one call from line 396, 3071
calls from line 384, 3730 calls from line 385, and 6525 calls from 387.
Flat profile:
cumulative self
% cycles cycles calls name
(K) (K)
7.69 0.10 0.01 ct_init (trees.c:349)
7.69 0.11 0.01 ct_init (trees.c:351)
7.69 0.12 0.01 ct_init (trees.c:382)
7.69 0.13 0.01 ct_init (trees.c:385)
Call graph (explanation follows)
index % self children called name
(K) (K)
0.00 0.00 1/13496 name_too_long (gzip.c:1440)
0.00 0.00 1/13496 deflate (deflate.c:763)
0.00 0.00 1/13496 ct_init (trees.c:396)
0.00 0.00 2/13496 deflate (deflate.c:727)
0.00 0.00 4/13496 deflate (deflate.c:686)
0.00 0.00 5/13496 deflate (deflate.c:675)
0.00 0.00 12/13496 deflate (deflate.c:679)
0.00 0.00 16/13496 deflate (deflate.c:730)
0.00 0.00 128/13496 deflate_fast (deflate.c:654)
0.00 0.00 3071/13496 ct_init (trees.c:384)
0.00 0.00 3730/13496 ct_init (trees.c:385)
0.00 0.00 6525/13496 ct_init (trees.c:387)
[6] 0.0 0.00 0.00 13496 init_block (trees.c:408)

File: gprof.info, Node: Annotated Source, Next: Other Events, Prev: Line-by-line, Up: Output
5.4 The Annotated Source Listing
================================
`gprof''s `-A' option triggers an annotated source listing, which lists
the program's source code, each function labeled with the number of
times it was called. You may also need to specify the `-I' option, if
`gprof' can't find the source code files.
If you use the Xtensa ISS to profile instruction counts, `gprof' can
determine how many times each basic-block of code was executed, and the
basic-block execution counts can be seen in the annotated source
listing. Run ISS with `--client_cmds="profile --instructions"' to
profile instruction counts. If you profile cycle counts (the default),
the basic-block execution counts are not available.
For example, consider the following function, taken from gzip, with
line numbers added:
1 ulg updcrc(s, n)
2 uch *s;
3 unsigned n;
4 {
5 register ulg c;
6
7 static ulg crc = (ulg)0xffffffffL;
8
9 if (s == NULL) {
10 c = 0xffffffffL;
11 } else {
12 c = crc;
13 if (n) do {
14 c = crc_32_tab[...];
15 } while (--n);
16 }
17 crc = c;
18 return c ^ 0xffffffffL;
19 }
`updcrc' has at least five basic-blocks. One is the function
itself. The `if' statement on line 9 generates two more basic-blocks,
one for each branch of the `if'. A fourth basic-block results from the
`if' on line 13, and the contents of the `do' loop form the fifth
basic-block. The compiler may also generate additional basic-blocks to
handle various special cases.
Run `xt-gprof -l -A' for line-by-line annotated source output. The
`-x' option is also helpful, to ensure that each line of code is
labeled at least once. Here is `updcrc''s annotated source listing for
a sample `gzip' run:
ulg updcrc(s, n)
uch *s;
unsigned n;
2 ->{
register ulg c;
static ulg crc = (ulg)0xffffffffL;
2 -> if (s == NULL) {
1 -> c = 0xffffffffL;
1 -> } else {
1 -> c = crc;
1 -> if (n) do {
26312 -> c = crc_32_tab[...];
26312,1,26311 -> } while (--n);
}
2 -> crc = c;
2 -> return c ^ 0xffffffffL;
2 ->}
In this example, the function was called twice, passing once through
each branch of the `if' statement. The body of the `do' loop was
executed a total of 26312 times. Note how the `while' statement is
annotated. It began execution 26312 times, once for each iteration
through the loop. One of those times (the last time) it exited, while
it branched back to the beginning of the loop 26311 times.

File: gprof.info, Node: Other Events, Prev: Annotated Source, Up: Output
5.5 Profiling Other Events
==========================
When analyzing a program's behavior, it may be helpful to profile events
other than cycle counts. The profiling client in the Xtensa ISS can
also collect information on events such as cache misses, pipeline
interlocks, etc. *Note Executing the Program: Executing. All the
features of `gprof' can be used to analyze the profile data, regardless
of the kind of events being profiled. The only change is that the
histogram counts in the profile data file represent the occurrence of
these other events for each instruction.
For example, here is an excerpt of the flat profile output when the
ISS was used to profile instruction cache misses in a small program:
Flat profile:
self total
cumulative self icmisses icmisses
% icmisses icmisses calls /call /call name
28.12 591.00 591.00 296 2.00 2.00 memcpy
12.32 850.00 259.00 86 3.01 3.01 check_range
7.66 1011.00 161.00 117 1.38 1.39 call
6.37 1145.00 134.00 133 1.01 6.60 exec
5.47 1260.00 115.00 38 3.03 3.25 _write_r
5.14 1368.00 108.00 38 2.84 2.84 memchr

File: gprof.info, Node: Inaccuracy, Next: GNU Free Documentation License, Prev: Output, Up: Top
6 Inaccuracy of `gprof' Output
******************************
* Menu:
* Sampling Error:: Statistical margins of error
* Assumptions:: Estimating children times

File: gprof.info, Node: Sampling Error, Next: Assumptions, Up: Inaccuracy
6.1 Statistical Sampling Error
==============================
This section does not apply when profiling with the Xtensa ISS. The
ISS collects profile data continuously--there is no sampling involved.
For hardware profiling, you can control the sampling errors to some
extent by adjusting the sampling frequency with the
`xt_profile_set_frequency' function. See the `Xtensa Software
Development Toolkit User's Guide' for more information on hardware
profiling.
The run-time figures that `gprof' gives you are based on a sampling
process, so they are subject to statistical inaccuracy. If a function
runs only a small amount of time, so that on the average the sampling
process ought to catch that function in the act only once, there is a
pretty good chance it will actually find that function zero times, or
twice.
By contrast, the number-of-calls and basic-block figures are derived
by counting, not sampling. They are completely accurate and will not
vary from run to run if your program is deterministic and single
threaded. In multi-threaded applications, or single threaded
applications that link with multi-threaded libraries, the counts are
only deterministic if the counting function is thread-safe. (Note:
beware that the mcount counting function in glibc is _not_ thread-safe).
The "sampling period" that is printed at the beginning of the flat
profile says how often samples are taken. The rule of thumb is that a
run-time figure is accurate if it is considerably bigger than the
sampling period.
The actual amount of error can be predicted. For N samples, the
_expected_ error is the square-root of N. For example, if the sampling
period is 0.01 seconds and `foo''s run-time is 1 second, N is 100
samples (1 second/0.01 seconds), sqrt(N) is 10 samples, so the expected
error in `foo''s run-time is 0.1 seconds (10*0.01 seconds), or ten
percent of the observed value. Again, if the sampling period is 0.01
seconds and `bar''s run-time is 100 seconds, N is 10000 samples,
sqrt(N) is 100 samples, so the expected error in `bar''s run-time is 1
second, or one percent of the observed value. It is likely to vary
this much _on the average_ from one profiling run to the next.
(_Sometimes_ it will vary more.)
This does not mean that a small run-time figure is devoid of
information. If the program's _total_ run-time is large, a small
run-time for one function does tell you that that function used an
insignificant fraction of the whole program's time. Usually this means
it is not worth optimizing.
One way to get more accuracy is to give your program more (but
similar) input data so it will take longer. Another way is to combine
the data from several runs, using the `-s' option of `gprof'. Here is
how:
1. Run your program once.
2. Issue the command `mv gmon.out gmon.sum'.
3. Run your program again, the same as before.
4. Merge the new data in `gmon.out' into `gmon.sum' with this command:
xt-gprof -s EXECUTABLE-FILE gmon.out gmon.sum
5. Repeat the last two steps as often as you wish.
6. Analyze the cumulative data using this command:
xtgprof EXECUTABLE-FILE gmon.sum > OUTPUT-FILE

File: gprof.info, Node: Assumptions, Prev: Sampling Error, Up: Inaccuracy
6.2 Estimating `children' Times
===============================
Some of the figures in the call graph are estimates--for example, the
`children' time values and all the time figures in caller and
subroutine lines.
There is no direct information about these measurements in the
profile data itself. Instead, `gprof' estimates them by making an
assumption about your program that might or might not be true.
The assumption made is that the average time spent in each call to
any function `foo' is not correlated with who called `foo'. If `foo'
used 5 seconds in all, and 2/5 of the calls to `foo' came from `a',
then `foo' contributes 2 seconds to `a''s `children' time, by
assumption.
This assumption is usually true enough, but for some programs it is
far from true. Suppose that `foo' returns very quickly when its
argument is zero; suppose that `a' always passes zero as an argument,
while other callers of `foo' pass other arguments. In this program,
all the time spent in `foo' is in the calls from callers other than `a'.
But `gprof' has no way of knowing this; it will blindly and incorrectly
charge 2 seconds of time in `foo' to the children of `a'.

File: gprof.info, Node: GNU Free Documentation License, Next: History, Prev: Inaccuracy, Up: Top
Appendix A GNU Free Documentation License
*****************************************
Version 1.3, 3 November 2008
Copyright (C) 2000, 2001, 2002, 2007, 2008 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
`http://fsf.org/'
Everyone is permitted to copy and distribute verbatim copies
of this license document, but changing it is not allowed.
0. PREAMBLE
The purpose of this License is to make a manual, textbook, or other
functional and useful document "free" in the sense of freedom: to
assure everyone the effective freedom to copy and redistribute it,
with or without modifying it, either commercially or
noncommercially. Secondarily, this License preserves for the
author and publisher a way to get credit for their work, while not
being considered responsible for modifications made by others.
This License is a kind of "copyleft", which means that derivative
works of the document must themselves be free in the same sense.
It complements the GNU General Public License, which is a copyleft
license designed for free software.
We have designed this License in order to use it for manuals for
free software, because free software needs free documentation: a
free program should come with manuals providing the same freedoms
that the software does. But this License is not limited to
software manuals; it can be used for any textual work, regardless
of subject matter or whether it is published as a printed book.
We recommend this License principally for works whose purpose is
instruction or reference.
1. APPLICABILITY AND DEFINITIONS
This License applies to any manual or other work, in any medium,
that contains a notice placed by the copyright holder saying it
can be distributed under the terms of this License. Such a notice
grants a world-wide, royalty-free license, unlimited in duration,
to use that work under the conditions stated herein. The
"Document", below, refers to any such manual or work. Any member
of the public is a licensee, and is addressed as "you". You
accept the license if you copy, modify or distribute the work in a
way requiring permission under copyright law.
A "Modified Version" of the Document means any work containing the
Document or a portion of it, either copied verbatim, or with
modifications and/or translated into another language.
A "Secondary Section" is a named appendix or a front-matter section
of the Document that deals exclusively with the relationship of the
publishers or authors of the Document to the Document's overall
subject (or to related matters) and contains nothing that could
fall directly within that overall subject. (Thus, if the Document
is in part a textbook of mathematics, a Secondary Section may not
explain any mathematics.) The relationship could be a matter of
historical connection with the subject or with related matters, or
of legal, commercial, philosophical, ethical or political position
regarding them.
The "Invariant Sections" are certain Secondary Sections whose
titles are designated, as being those of Invariant Sections, in
the notice that says that the Document is released under this
License. If a section does not fit the above definition of
Secondary then it is not allowed to be designated as Invariant.
The Document may contain zero Invariant Sections. If the Document
does not identify any Invariant Sections then there are none.
The "Cover Texts" are certain short passages of text that are
listed, as Front-Cover Texts or Back-Cover Texts, in the notice
that says that the Document is released under this License. A
Front-Cover Text may be at most 5 words, and a Back-Cover Text may
be at most 25 words.
A "Transparent" copy of the Document means a machine-readable copy,
represented in a format whose specification is available to the
general public, that is suitable for revising the document
straightforwardly with generic text editors or (for images
composed of pixels) generic paint programs or (for drawings) some
widely available drawing editor, and that is suitable for input to
text formatters or for automatic translation to a variety of
formats suitable for input to text formatters. A copy made in an
otherwise Transparent file format whose markup, or absence of
markup, has been arranged to thwart or discourage subsequent
modification by readers is not Transparent. An image format is
not Transparent if used for any substantial amount of text. A
copy that is not "Transparent" is called "Opaque".
Examples of suitable formats for Transparent copies include plain
ASCII without markup, Texinfo input format, LaTeX input format,
SGML or XML using a publicly available DTD, and
standard-conforming simple HTML, PostScript or PDF designed for
human modification. Examples of transparent image formats include
PNG, XCF and JPG. Opaque formats include proprietary formats that
can be read and edited only by proprietary word processors, SGML or
XML for which the DTD and/or processing tools are not generally
available, and the machine-generated HTML, PostScript or PDF
produced by some word processors for output purposes only.
The "Title Page" means, for a printed book, the title page itself,
plus such following pages as are needed to hold, legibly, the
material this License requires to appear in the title page. For
works in formats which do not have any title page as such, "Title
Page" means the text near the most prominent appearance of the
work's title, preceding the beginning of the body of the text.
The "publisher" means any person or entity that distributes copies
of the Document to the public.
A section "Entitled XYZ" means a named subunit of the Document
whose title either is precisely XYZ or contains XYZ in parentheses
following text that translates XYZ in another language. (Here XYZ
stands for a specific section name mentioned below, such as
"Acknowledgements", "Dedications", "Endorsements", or "History".)
To "Preserve the Title" of such a section when you modify the
Document means that it remains a section "Entitled XYZ" according
to this definition.
The Document may include Warranty Disclaimers next to the notice
which states that this License applies to the Document. These
Warranty Disclaimers are considered to be included by reference in
this License, but only as regards disclaiming warranties: any other
implication that these Warranty Disclaimers may have is void and
has no effect on the meaning of this License.
2. VERBATIM COPYING
You may copy and distribute the Document in any medium, either
commercially or noncommercially, provided that this License, the
copyright notices, and the license notice saying this License
applies to the Document are reproduced in all copies, and that you
add no other conditions whatsoever to those of this License. You
may not use technical measures to obstruct or control the reading
or further copying of the copies you make or distribute. However,
you may accept compensation in exchange for copies. If you
distribute a large enough number of copies you must also follow
the conditions in section 3.
You may also lend copies, under the same conditions stated above,
and you may publicly display copies.
3. COPYING IN QUANTITY
If you publish printed copies (or copies in media that commonly
have printed covers) of the Document, numbering more than 100, and
the Document's license notice requires Cover Texts, you must
enclose the copies in covers that carry, clearly and legibly, all
these Cover Texts: Front-Cover Texts on the front cover, and
Back-Cover Texts on the back cover. Both covers must also clearly
and legibly identify you as the publisher of these copies. The
front cover must present the full title with all words of the
title equally prominent and visible. You may add other material
on the covers in addition. Copying with changes limited to the
covers, as long as they preserve the title of the Document and
satisfy these conditions, can be treated as verbatim copying in
other respects.
If the required texts for either cover are too voluminous to fit
legibly, you should put the first ones listed (as many as fit
reasonably) on the actual cover, and continue the rest onto
adjacent pages.
If you publish or distribute Opaque copies of the Document
numbering more than 100, you must either include a
machine-readable Transparent copy along with each Opaque copy, or
state in or with each Opaque copy a computer-network location from
which the general network-using public has access to download
using public-standard network protocols a complete Transparent
copy of the Document, free of added material. If you use the
latter option, you must take reasonably prudent steps, when you
begin distribution of Opaque copies in quantity, to ensure that
this Transparent copy will remain thus accessible at the stated
location until at least one year after the last time you
distribute an Opaque copy (directly or through your agents or
retailers) of that edition to the public.
It is requested, but not required, that you contact the authors of
the Document well before redistributing any large number of
copies, to give them a chance to provide you with an updated
version of the Document.
4. MODIFICATIONS
You may copy and distribute a Modified Version of the Document
under the conditions of sections 2 and 3 above, provided that you
release the Modified Version under precisely this License, with
the Modified Version filling the role of the Document, thus
licensing distribution and modification of the Modified Version to
whoever possesses a copy of it. In addition, you must do these
things in the Modified Version:
A. Use in the Title Page (and on the covers, if any) a title
distinct from that of the Document, and from those of
previous versions (which should, if there were any, be listed
in the History section of the Document). You may use the
same title as a previous version if the original publisher of
that version gives permission.
B. List on the Title Page, as authors, one or more persons or
entities responsible for authorship of the modifications in
the Modified Version, together with at least five of the
principal authors of the Document (all of its principal
authors, if it has fewer than five), unless they release you
from this requirement.
C. State on the Title page the name of the publisher of the
Modified Version, as the publisher.
D. Preserve all the copyright notices of the Document.
E. Add an appropriate copyright notice for your modifications
adjacent to the other copyright notices.
F. Include, immediately after the copyright notices, a license
notice giving the public permission to use the Modified
Version under the terms of this License, in the form shown in
the Addendum below.
G. Preserve in that license notice the full lists of Invariant
Sections and required Cover Texts given in the Document's
license notice.
H. Include an unaltered copy of this License.
I. Preserve the section Entitled "History", Preserve its Title,
and add to it an item stating at least the title, year, new
authors, and publisher of the Modified Version as given on
the Title Page. If there is no section Entitled "History" in
the Document, create one stating the title, year, authors,
and publisher of the Document as given on its Title Page,
then add an item describing the Modified Version as stated in
the previous sentence.
J. Preserve the network location, if any, given in the Document
for public access to a Transparent copy of the Document, and
likewise the network locations given in the Document for
previous versions it was based on. These may be placed in
the "History" section. You may omit a network location for a
work that was published at least four years before the
Document itself, or if the original publisher of the version
it refers to gives permission.
K. For any section Entitled "Acknowledgements" or "Dedications",
Preserve the Title of the section, and preserve in the
section all the substance and tone of each of the contributor
acknowledgements and/or dedications given therein.
L. Preserve all the Invariant Sections of the Document,
unaltered in their text and in their titles. Section numbers
or the equivalent are not considered part of the section
titles.
M. Delete any section Entitled "Endorsements". Such a section
may not be included in the Modified Version.
N. Do not retitle any existing section to be Entitled
"Endorsements" or to conflict in title with any Invariant
Section.
O. Preserve any Warranty Disclaimers.
If the Modified Version includes new front-matter sections or
appendices that qualify as Secondary Sections and contain no
material copied from the Document, you may at your option
designate some or all of these sections as invariant. To do this,
add their titles to the list of Invariant Sections in the Modified
Version's license notice. These titles must be distinct from any
other section titles.
You may add a section Entitled "Endorsements", provided it contains
nothing but endorsements of your Modified Version by various
parties--for example, statements of peer review or that the text
has been approved by an organization as the authoritative
definition of a standard.
You may add a passage of up to five words as a Front-Cover Text,
and a passage of up to 25 words as a Back-Cover Text, to the end
of the list of Cover Texts in the Modified Version. Only one
passage of Front-Cover Text and one of Back-Cover Text may be
added by (or through arrangements made by) any one entity. If the
Document already includes a cover text for the same cover,
previously added by you or by arrangement made by the same entity
you are acting on behalf of, you may not add another; but you may
replace the old one, on explicit permission from the previous
publisher that added the old one.
The author(s) and publisher(s) of the Document do not by this
License give permission to use their names for publicity for or to
assert or imply endorsement of any Modified Version.
5. COMBINING DOCUMENTS
You may combine the Document with other documents released under
this License, under the terms defined in section 4 above for
modified versions, provided that you include in the combination
all of the Invariant Sections of all of the original documents,
unmodified, and list them all as Invariant Sections of your
combined work in its license notice, and that you preserve all
their Warranty Disclaimers.
The combined work need only contain one copy of this License, and
multiple identical Invariant Sections may be replaced with a single
copy. If there are multiple Invariant Sections with the same name
but different contents, make the title of each such section unique
by adding at the end of it, in parentheses, the name of the
original author or publisher of that section if known, or else a
unique number. Make the same adjustment to the section titles in
the list of Invariant Sections in the license notice of the
combined work.
In the combination, you must combine any sections Entitled
"History" in the various original documents, forming one section
Entitled "History"; likewise combine any sections Entitled
"Acknowledgements", and any sections Entitled "Dedications". You
must delete all sections Entitled "Endorsements."
6. COLLECTIONS OF DOCUMENTS
You may make a collection consisting of the Document and other
documents released under this License, and replace the individual
copies of this License in the various documents with a single copy
that is included in the collection, provided that you follow the
rules of this License for verbatim copying of each of the
documents in all other respects.
You may extract a single document from such a collection, and
distribute it individually under this License, provided you insert
a copy of this License into the extracted document, and follow
this License in all other respects regarding verbatim copying of
that document.
7. AGGREGATION WITH INDEPENDENT WORKS
A compilation of the Document or its derivatives with other
separate and independent documents or works, in or on a volume of
a storage or distribution medium, is called an "aggregate" if the
copyright resulting from the compilation is not used to limit the
legal rights of the compilation's users beyond what the individual
works permit. When the Document is included in an aggregate, this
License does not apply to the other works in the aggregate which
are not themselves derivative works of the Document.
If the Cover Text requirement of section 3 is applicable to these
copies of the Document, then if the Document is less than one half
of the entire aggregate, the Document's Cover Texts may be placed
on covers that bracket the Document within the aggregate, or the
electronic equivalent of covers if the Document is in electronic
form. Otherwise they must appear on printed covers that bracket
the whole aggregate.
8. TRANSLATION
Translation is considered a kind of modification, so you may
distribute translations of the Document under the terms of section
4. Replacing Invariant Sections with translations requires special
permission from their copyright holders, but you may include
translations of some or all Invariant Sections in addition to the
original versions of these Invariant Sections. You may include a
translation of this License, and all the license notices in the
Document, and any Warranty Disclaimers, provided that you also
include the original English version of this License and the
original versions of those notices and disclaimers. In case of a
disagreement between the translation and the original version of
this License or a notice or disclaimer, the original version will
prevail.
If a section in the Document is Entitled "Acknowledgements",
"Dedications", or "History", the requirement (section 4) to
Preserve its Title (section 1) will typically require changing the
actual title.
9. TERMINATION
You may not copy, modify, sublicense, or distribute the Document
except as expressly provided under this License. Any attempt
otherwise to copy, modify, sublicense, or distribute it is void,
and will automatically terminate your rights under this License.
However, if you cease all violation of this License, then your
license from a particular copyright holder is reinstated (a)
provisionally, unless and until the copyright holder explicitly
and finally terminates your license, and (b) permanently, if the
copyright holder fails to notify you of the violation by some
reasonable means prior to 60 days after the cessation.
Moreover, your license from a particular copyright holder is
reinstated permanently if the copyright holder notifies you of the
violation by some reasonable means, this is the first time you have
received notice of violation of this License (for any work) from
that copyright holder, and you cure the violation prior to 30 days
after your receipt of the notice.
Termination of your rights under this section does not terminate
the licenses of parties who have received copies or rights from
you under this License. If your rights have been terminated and
not permanently reinstated, receipt of a copy of some or all of
the same material does not give you any rights to use it.
10. FUTURE REVISIONS OF THIS LICENSE
The Free Software Foundation may publish new, revised versions of
the GNU Free Documentation License from time to time. Such new
versions will be similar in spirit to the present version, but may
differ in detail to address new problems or concerns. See
`http://www.gnu.org/copyleft/'.
Each version of the License is given a distinguishing version
number. If the Document specifies that a particular numbered
version of this License "or any later version" applies to it, you
have the option of following the terms and conditions either of
that specified version or of any later version that has been
published (not as a draft) by the Free Software Foundation. If
the Document does not specify a version number of this License,
you may choose any version ever published (not as a draft) by the
Free Software Foundation. If the Document specifies that a proxy
can decide which future versions of this License can be used, that
proxy's public statement of acceptance of a version permanently
authorizes you to choose that version for the Document.
11. RELICENSING
"Massive Multiauthor Collaboration Site" (or "MMC Site") means any
World Wide Web server that publishes copyrightable works and also
provides prominent facilities for anybody to edit those works. A
public wiki that anybody can edit is an example of such a server.
A "Massive Multiauthor Collaboration" (or "MMC") contained in the
site means any set of copyrightable works thus published on the MMC
site.
"CC-BY-SA" means the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0
license published by Creative Commons Corporation, a not-for-profit
corporation with a principal place of business in San Francisco,
California, as well as future copyleft versions of that license
published by that same organization.
"Incorporate" means to publish or republish a Document, in whole or
in part, as part of another Document.
An MMC is "eligible for relicensing" if it is licensed under this
License, and if all works that were first published under this
License somewhere other than this MMC, and subsequently
incorporated in whole or in part into the MMC, (1) had no cover
texts or invariant sections, and (2) were thus incorporated prior
to November 1, 2008.
The operator of an MMC Site may republish an MMC contained in the
site under CC-BY-SA on the same site at any time before August 1,
2009, provided the MMC is eligible for relicensing.
ADDENDUM: How to use this License for your documents
====================================================
To use this License in a document you have written, include a copy of
the License in the document and put the following copyright and license
notices just after the title page:
Copyright (C) YEAR YOUR NAME.
Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document
under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.3
or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation;
with no Invariant Sections, no Front-Cover Texts, and no Back-Cover
Texts. A copy of the license is included in the section entitled ``GNU
Free Documentation License''.
If you have Invariant Sections, Front-Cover Texts and Back-Cover
Texts, replace the "with...Texts." line with this:
with the Invariant Sections being LIST THEIR TITLES, with
the Front-Cover Texts being LIST, and with the Back-Cover Texts
being LIST.
If you have Invariant Sections without Cover Texts, or some other
combination of the three, merge those two alternatives to suit the
situation.
If your document contains nontrivial examples of program code, we
recommend releasing these examples in parallel under your choice of
free software license, such as the GNU General Public License, to
permit their use in free software.

File: gprof.info, Node: History, Prev: GNU Free Documentation License, Up: Top
Appendix B History
******************
The original version of this document, entitled "GNU gprof, the GNU
Profiler", was written by Jay Fenlason and Richard Stallman. The
version for `gprof' 2.18 was released in 2007 and published by the Free
Software Foundation.
Tensilica, Inc. changed the title to "GNU Profiler User's Guide" and
modified the document to include features specific to Xtensa processors.
The revised document was published by Tensilica, Inc. on the date shown
in the inside cover page. The TeXinfo source files for this modified
document are available from `http://www.tensilica.com/gnudocs'.

Tag Table:
Node: Top1998
Node: Revisions3144
Node: Introduction3440
Node: Compiling8542
Node: Executing11630
Node: Xtensa ISS12414
Node: Xtensa Hardware15019
Node: Invoking15808
Node: Output Options17093
Node: Analysis Options24281
Node: Miscellaneous Options29200
Node: Symspecs30403
Node: Output32232
Node: Flat Profile33339
Node: Call Graph38541
Node: Primary42141
Node: Callers44735
Node: Subroutines46868
Node: Cycles48723
Node: Line-by-line55660
Node: Annotated Source59795
Node: Other Events62848
Node: Inaccuracy64285
Node: Sampling Error64564
Node: Assumptions67823
Node: GNU Free Documentation License69078
Node: History94243

End Tag Table