1069 lines
42 KiB
Markdown
1069 lines
42 KiB
Markdown
# Proxy support in Chrome
|
|
|
|
This document establishes basic proxy terminology and describes Chrome-specific
|
|
proxy behaviors.
|
|
|
|
[TOC]
|
|
|
|
## Proxy server identifiers
|
|
|
|
A proxy server is an intermediary used for network requests. A proxy server can
|
|
be described by its address, along with the proxy scheme that should be used to
|
|
communicate with it.
|
|
|
|
This can be written as a string using either the "PAC format" or the "URI
|
|
format".
|
|
|
|
The PAC format is how one names a proxy server in [Proxy
|
|
auto-config](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proxy_auto-config) scripts. For
|
|
example:
|
|
* `PROXY foo:2138`
|
|
* `SOCKS5 foo:1080`
|
|
* `DIRECT`
|
|
|
|
The "URI format" instead encodes the information as a URL. For example:
|
|
* `foo:2138`
|
|
* `http://foo:2138`
|
|
* `socks5://foo:1080`
|
|
* `direct://`
|
|
|
|
The port number is optional in both formats. When omitted, a per-scheme default
|
|
is used.
|
|
|
|
See the [Proxy server schemes](#Proxy-server-schemes) section for details on
|
|
what schemes Chrome supports, and how to write them in the PAC and URI formats.
|
|
|
|
Most UI surfaces in Chrome (including command lines and policy) expect URI
|
|
formatted proxy server identifiers. However outside of Chrome, proxy servers
|
|
are generally identified less precisely by just an address -- the proxy
|
|
scheme is assumed based on context.
|
|
|
|
In Windows' proxy settings there are host and port fields for the
|
|
"HTTP", "Secure", "FTP", and "SOCKS" proxy. With the exception of "SOCKS",
|
|
those are all identifiers for insecure HTTP proxy servers (proxy scheme is
|
|
assumed as HTTP).
|
|
|
|
## Proxy resolution
|
|
|
|
Proxying in Chrome is done at the URL level.
|
|
|
|
When the browser is asked to fetch a URL, it needs to decide which IP endpoint
|
|
to send the request to. This can be either a proxy server, or the target host.
|
|
|
|
This is called proxy resolution. The input to proxy resolution is a URL, and
|
|
the output is an ordered list of [proxy server
|
|
identifiers](#Proxy-server-identifiers).
|
|
|
|
What proxies to use can be described using either:
|
|
|
|
* [Manual proxy settings](#Manual-proxy-settings) - proxy resolution is defined
|
|
using a declarative set of rules. These rules are expressed as a mapping from
|
|
URL scheme to proxy server identifier(s), and a list of proxy bypass rules for
|
|
when to go DIRECT instead of using the mapped proxy.
|
|
|
|
* PAC script - proxy resolution is defined using a JavaScript program, that is
|
|
invoked whenever fetching a URL to get the list of proxy server identifiers
|
|
to use.
|
|
|
|
* Auto-detect - the WPAD protocol is used to probe the network (using DHCP/DNS)
|
|
and possibly discover the URL of a PAC script.
|
|
|
|
## Proxy server schemes
|
|
|
|
When using an explicit proxy in the browser, multiple layers of the network
|
|
request are impacted, depending on the scheme that is used. Some implications
|
|
of the proxy scheme are:
|
|
|
|
* Is communication to the proxy done over a secure channel?
|
|
* Is name resolution (ex: DNS) done client side, or proxy side?
|
|
* What authentication schemes to the proxy server are supported?
|
|
* What network traffic can be sent through the proxy?
|
|
|
|
Chrome supports these proxy server schemes:
|
|
|
|
* [DIRECT](#DIRECT-proxy-scheme)
|
|
* [HTTP](#HTTP-proxy-scheme)
|
|
* [HTTPS](#HTTPS-proxy-scheme)
|
|
* [SOCKSv4](#SOCKSv4-proxy-scheme)
|
|
* [SOCKSv5](#SOCKSv5-proxy-scheme)
|
|
* [QUIC](#QUIC-proxy-scheme)
|
|
|
|
### DIRECT proxy scheme
|
|
|
|
* Default port: N/A (neither host nor port are applicable)
|
|
* Example identifier (PAC): `DIRECT`
|
|
* Example identifier (URI): `direct://`
|
|
|
|
This is a pseudo proxy scheme that indicates instead of using a proxy we are
|
|
sending the request directly to the target server.
|
|
|
|
It is imprecise to call this a "proxy server", but it is a convenient abstraction.
|
|
|
|
### HTTP proxy scheme
|
|
|
|
* Default port: 80
|
|
* Example identifier (PAC): `PROXY proxy:8080`, `proxy` (non-standard; don't use)
|
|
* Example identifiers (URI): `http://proxy:8080`, `proxy:8080` (can omit scheme)
|
|
|
|
Generally when one refers to a "proxy server" or "web proxy", they are talking
|
|
about an HTTP proxy.
|
|
|
|
When using an HTTP proxy in Chrome, name resolution is always deferred to the
|
|
proxy. HTTP proxies can proxy `http://`, `https://`, `ws://` and `wss://` URLs.
|
|
|
|
Communication to HTTP proxy servers is insecure, meaning proxied `http://`
|
|
requests are sent in the clear. When proxying `https://` requests through an
|
|
HTTP proxy, the TLS exchange is forwarded through the proxy using the `CONNECT`
|
|
method, so end-to-end encryption is not broken. However when establishing the
|
|
tunnel, the hostname of the target URL is sent to the proxy server in the
|
|
clear.
|
|
|
|
HTTP proxies in Chrome support the same HTTP authentiation schemes as for
|
|
target servers: Basic, Digest, Negotiate, NTLM.
|
|
|
|
### HTTPS proxy scheme
|
|
|
|
* Default port: 443
|
|
* Example identifier (PAC): `HTTPS proxy:8080`
|
|
* Example identifier (URI): `https://proxy:8080`
|
|
|
|
This works like an [HTTP proxy](#HTTP-proxy-scheme), except the
|
|
communication to the proxy server is protected by TLS, and may negotiate
|
|
HTTP/2 (but not QUIC).
|
|
|
|
Because the connection to the proxy server is secure, https:// requests
|
|
sent through the proxy are not sent in the clear as with an HTTP proxy.
|
|
Similarly, since CONNECT requests are sent over a protected channel, the
|
|
hostnames for proxied https:// URLs is also not revealed.
|
|
|
|
In addition to the usual HTTP authentication methods, HTTPS proxies also
|
|
support client certificates.
|
|
|
|
HTTPS proxies using HTTP/2 can offer better performance in Chrome than a
|
|
regular HTTP proxy due to higher connection limits (HTTP/1.1 proxies in Chrome
|
|
are limited to 32 simultaneous connections across all domains).
|
|
|
|
Chrome, Firefox, and Opera support HTTPS proxies; however, most older HTTP
|
|
stacks do not.
|
|
|
|
Specifying an HTTPS proxy is generally not possible through system proxy
|
|
settings. Instead, one must use either a PAC script or a Chrome proxy setting
|
|
(command line, extension, or policy).
|
|
|
|
See the dev.chromium.org document on [secure web
|
|
proxies](http://dev.chromium.org/developers/design-documents/secure-web-proxy)
|
|
for tips on how to run and test against an HTTPS proxy.
|
|
|
|
### SOCKSv4 proxy scheme
|
|
|
|
* Default port: 1080
|
|
* Example identifiers (PAC): `SOCKS4 proxy:8080`, `SOCKS proxy:8080`
|
|
* Example identifier (URI): `socks4://proxy:8080`
|
|
|
|
SOCKSv4 is a simple transport layer proxy that wraps a TCP socket. Its use
|
|
is transparent to the rest of the protocol stack; after an initial
|
|
handshake when connecting the TCP socket (to the proxy), the rest of the
|
|
loading stack is unchanged.
|
|
|
|
No proxy authentication methods are supported for SOCKSv4.
|
|
|
|
When using a SOCKSv4 proxy, name resolution for target hosts is always done
|
|
client side, and moreover must resolve to an IPv4 address (SOCKSv4 encodes
|
|
target address as 4 octets, so IPv6 targets are not possible).
|
|
|
|
There are extensions to SOCKSv4 that allow for proxy side name resolution, and
|
|
IPv6, namely SOCKSv4a. However Chrome does not allow configuring, or falling
|
|
back to v4a.
|
|
|
|
A better alternative is to just use the newer version of the protocol, SOCKSv5
|
|
(which is still 20+ years old).
|
|
|
|
### SOCKSv5 proxy scheme
|
|
|
|
* Default port: 1080
|
|
* Example identifier (PAC): `SOCKS5 proxy:8080`
|
|
* Example identifiers (URI): `socks://proxy:8080`, `socks5://proxy:8080`
|
|
|
|
[SOCKSv5](https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1928) is a transport layer proxy that
|
|
wraps a TCP socket, and allows for name resolution to be deferred to the proxy.
|
|
|
|
In Chrome when a proxy's scheme is set to SOCKSv5, name resolution is always
|
|
done proxy side (even though the protocol allows for client side as well). In
|
|
Firefox client side vs proxy side name resolution can be configured with
|
|
`network.proxy.socks_remote_dns`; Chrome has no equivalent option and will
|
|
always use proxy side resolution.
|
|
|
|
No authentication methods are supported for SOCKSv5 in Chrome (although some do
|
|
exist for the protocol).
|
|
|
|
A handy way to create a SOCKSv5 proxy is with `ssh -D`, which can be used to
|
|
tunnel web traffic to a remote host over SSH.
|
|
|
|
In Chrome SOCKSv5 is only used to proxy TCP-based URL requests. It cannot be
|
|
used to relay UDP traffic.
|
|
|
|
### QUIC proxy scheme
|
|
|
|
* Default (UDP) port: 443
|
|
* Example identifier (PAC): `QUIC proxy:8080`
|
|
* Example identifier (URI): `quic://proxy:8080`
|
|
|
|
A QUIC proxy uses QUIC (UDP) as the underlying transport, but otherwise
|
|
behaves as an HTTP proxy. It has similar properties to an [HTTPS
|
|
proxy](#HTTPS-proxy-scheme), in that the connection to the proxy server
|
|
is secure, and connection limits are less restrictive.
|
|
|
|
Support for QUIC proxies in Chrome is currently experimental and not
|
|
ready for production use. In particular, sending https:// and wss://
|
|
URLs through a QUIC proxy is [disabled by
|
|
default](https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=969859).
|
|
|
|
Another caveat is that QUIC does not currently support
|
|
client certificates since it does not use a TLS
|
|
handshake. This may change in future versions.
|
|
|
|
## Manual proxy settings
|
|
|
|
The simplest way to configure proxy resolution is by providing a static list of
|
|
rules comprised of:
|
|
|
|
1. A mapping of URL schemes to [proxy server identifiers](#Proxy-server-identifiers).
|
|
2. A list of [proxy bypass rules](#Proxy-bypass-rules)
|
|
|
|
We refer to this mode of configuration as "manual proxy settings".
|
|
|
|
Manual proxy settings can succinctly describe setups like:
|
|
|
|
* Use proxy `http://foo:8080` for all requests
|
|
* Use proxy `http://foo:8080` for all requests except those to a `google.com`
|
|
subdomain.
|
|
* Use proxy `http://foo:8080` for all `https://` requests, and proxy
|
|
`socsk5://mysocks:90` for everything else
|
|
|
|
Although manual proxy settings are a ubiquituous way to configure proxies
|
|
across platforms, there is no standard representation or feature set.
|
|
|
|
Chrome's manual proxy settings most closely resembles that of WinInet. But it
|
|
also supports idioms from other platforms -- for instance KDE's notion of
|
|
reversing the bypass list, or Gnome's interpretation of bypass patterns as
|
|
suffix matches.
|
|
|
|
When defining manual proxy settings in Chrome, we specify three (possibly
|
|
empty) lists of [proxy server identifiers](#Proxy-server-identifiers).
|
|
|
|
* proxies for HTTP - A list of proxy server identifiers to use for `http://`
|
|
requests, if non-empty.
|
|
* proxies for HTTPS - A list of proxy server identifiers to use for
|
|
`https://` requests, if non-empty.
|
|
* other proxies - A list of proxy server identifiers to use for everything
|
|
else (whatever isn't matched by the other two lists)
|
|
|
|
There are a lot of ways to end up with manual proxy settings in Chrome
|
|
(discussed in other sections).
|
|
|
|
The following examples will use the command line method. Launching Chrome with
|
|
`--proxy-server=XXX` (and optionally `--proxy-bypass-list=YYY`)
|
|
|
|
Example: To use proxy `http://foo:8080` for all requests we can launch
|
|
Chrome with `--proxy-server="http://foo:8080"`. This translates to:
|
|
|
|
* proxies for HTTP - *empty*
|
|
* proxies for HTTPS - *empty*
|
|
* other proxies - `http://foo:8080`
|
|
|
|
With the above configuration, if the proxy server was unreachable all requests
|
|
would fail with `ERR_PROXY_CONNECTION_FAILED`. To address this we could add a
|
|
fallback to `DIRECT` by launching using
|
|
`--proxy-server="http://foo:8080,direct://"` (note the comma separated list).
|
|
This command line means:
|
|
|
|
* proxies for HTTP - *empty*
|
|
* proxies for HTTPS - *empty*
|
|
* other proxies - `http://foo:8080`, `direct://`
|
|
|
|
If instead we wanted to proxy only `http://` URLs through the
|
|
HTTPS proxy `https://foo:443`, and have everything else use the SOCKSv5 proxy
|
|
`socks5://mysocks:1080` we could launch Chrome with
|
|
`--proxy-server="http=https://foo:443;socks=socks5://mysocks:1080"`. This now
|
|
expands to:
|
|
|
|
* proxies for HTTP - `https://foo:443`
|
|
* proxies for HTTPS - *empty*
|
|
* other proxies - `socks5://mysocks:1080`
|
|
|
|
The command line above uses WinInet's proxy map format, with some additional
|
|
features:
|
|
|
|
* Instead of naming proxy servers by just a hostname:port, you can use Chrome's
|
|
URI format for proxy server identifiers. In other words, you can prefix the
|
|
proxy scheme so it doesn't default to HTTP.
|
|
* The `socks=` mapping is understood more broadly as "other proxies". The
|
|
subsequent proxy list can include proxies of any scheme, however if the
|
|
scheme is omitted it will be understood as SOCKSv4 rather than HTTP.
|
|
|
|
### Mapping WebSockets URLs to a proxy
|
|
|
|
[Manual proxy settings](#Manual-proxy-settings) don't have mappings for `ws://`
|
|
or `wss://` URLs.
|
|
|
|
Selecting a proxy for these URL schemes is a bit different from other URL
|
|
schemes. The algorithm that Chrome uses is:
|
|
|
|
* If "other proxies" is non-empty use it
|
|
* If "proxies for HTTPS" is non-empty use it
|
|
* Otherwise use "proxies for HTTP"
|
|
|
|
This is per the recommendation in section 4.1.3 of [RFC
|
|
6455](https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6455).
|
|
|
|
It is possible to route `ws://` and `wss://` separately using a PAC script.
|
|
|
|
### Proxy credentials in manual proxy settings
|
|
|
|
Most platforms' [manual proxy settings](#Manual-proxy-settings) allow
|
|
specifying a cleartext username/password for proxy sign in. Chrome does not
|
|
implement this, and will not use any credentials embedded in the proxy
|
|
settings.
|
|
|
|
Proxy authentication will instead go through the ordinary flow to find
|
|
credentials.
|
|
|
|
## Proxy bypass rules
|
|
|
|
In addition to specifying three lists of [proxy server
|
|
identifiers](#proxy-server-identifiers), Chrome's [manual proxy
|
|
settings](#Manual-proxy-settings) lets you specify a list of "proxy bypass
|
|
rules".
|
|
|
|
This ruleset determines whether a given URL should skip use of a proxy all
|
|
together, even when a proxy is otherwise defined for it.
|
|
|
|
This concept is also known by names like "exception list", "exclusion list" or
|
|
"no proxy list".
|
|
|
|
Proxy bypass rules can be written as an ordered list of strings. Ordering
|
|
generally doesn't matter, but may when using subtractive rules.
|
|
|
|
When manual proxy settings are specified from the command line, the
|
|
`--proxy-bypass-list="RULES"` switch can be used, where `RULES` is a semicolon
|
|
or comma separated list of bypass rules.
|
|
|
|
Following are the string constructions for the bypass rules that Chrome
|
|
supports. They can be used when defining a Chrome manual proxy settings from
|
|
command line flags, extensions, or policy.
|
|
|
|
When using system proxy settings, one should use the platform's rule format and
|
|
not Chrome's.
|
|
|
|
### Bypass rule: Hostname
|
|
|
|
```
|
|
[ URL_SCHEME "://" ] HOSTNAME_PATTERN [ ":" <port> ]
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
Matches a hostname using a wildcard pattern, and an optional scheme and port
|
|
restriction.
|
|
|
|
Examples:
|
|
|
|
* `foobar.com` - Matches URL of any scheme and port, whose normalized host is
|
|
`foobar.com`
|
|
* `*foobar.com` - Matches URL of any scheme and port, whose normalized host
|
|
ends with `foobar.com` (for instance `blahfoobar.com` and `foo.foobar.com`).
|
|
* `*.org:443` - Matches URLs of any scheme, using port 443 and whose top level
|
|
domain is `.org`
|
|
* `https://x.*.y.com:99` - Matches https:// URLs on port 99 whose normalized
|
|
hostname matches `x.*.y.com`
|
|
|
|
### Bypass rule: Subdomain
|
|
|
|
```
|
|
[ URL_SCHEME "://" ] "." HOSTNAME_SUFFIX_PATTERN [ ":" PORT ]
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
Hostname patterns that start with a dot are special cased to mean a subdomain
|
|
matches. `.foo.com` is effectively another way of writing `*.foo.com`.
|
|
|
|
Examples:
|
|
|
|
* `.google.com` - Matches `calendar.google.com` and `foo.bar.google.com`, but
|
|
not `google.com`.
|
|
* `http://.google.com` - Matches only http:// URLs that are a subdomain of `google.com`.
|
|
|
|
### Bypass rule: IP literal
|
|
|
|
```
|
|
[ SCHEME "://" ] IP_LITERAL [ ":" PORT ]
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
Matches URLs that are IP address literals, and optional scheme and port
|
|
restrictions. This is a special case of hostname matching that takes into
|
|
account IP literal canonicalization. For example the rules `[0:0:0::1]` and
|
|
`[::1]` are equivalent (both represent the same IPv6 address).
|
|
|
|
Examples:
|
|
|
|
* `127.0.0.1`
|
|
* `http://127.0.0.1`
|
|
* `[::1]` - Matches any URL to the IPv6 loopback address.
|
|
* `[0:0::1]` - Same as above
|
|
* `http://[::1]:99` - Matches any http:// URL to the IPv6 loopback on port 99
|
|
|
|
### Bypass rule: IPv4 address range
|
|
|
|
```
|
|
IPV4_LITERAL "/" PREFIX_LENGTH_IN_BITS
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
Matches any URL whose hostname is an IPv4 literal, and falls between the given
|
|
address range.
|
|
|
|
Note this [only applies to URLs that are IP
|
|
literals](#Meaning-of-IP-address-range-bypass-rules).
|
|
|
|
Examples:
|
|
|
|
* `192.168.1.1/16`
|
|
|
|
### Bypass rule: IPv6 address range
|
|
|
|
```
|
|
IPV6_LITERAL "/" PREFIX_LENGTH_IN_BITS
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
Matches any URL that is an IPv6 literal that falls between the given range.
|
|
Note that IPv6 literals must *not* be bracketed.
|
|
|
|
Note this [only applies to URLs that are IP
|
|
literals](#Meaning-of-IP-address-range-bypass-rules).
|
|
|
|
Examples:
|
|
|
|
* `fefe:13::abc/33`
|
|
* `[fefe::]/40` -- WRONG! IPv6 literals must not be bracketed.
|
|
|
|
### Bypass rule: Simple hostnames
|
|
|
|
```
|
|
<local>
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
Matches hostnames without a period in them, and that are not IP literals. This
|
|
is a naive string search -- meaning that periods appearing *anywhere* count
|
|
(including trailing dots!).
|
|
|
|
This rule corresponds to the "Exclude simple hostnames" checkbox on macOS and
|
|
the "Don't use proxy server for local (intranet) addresses" on Windows.
|
|
|
|
The rule name comes from WinInet, and can easily be confused with the concept
|
|
of localhost. However the two concepts are completely orthogonal. In practice
|
|
one wouldn't add rules to bypass localhost, as it is [already done
|
|
implicitly](#Implicit-bypass-rules).
|
|
|
|
### Bypass rule: Subtract implicit rules
|
|
|
|
```
|
|
<-loopback>
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
*Subtracts* the [implicit proxy bypass rules](#Implicit-bypass-rules)
|
|
(localhost and link local addresses). This is generally only needed for test
|
|
setups. Beware of the security implications to proxying localhost.
|
|
|
|
Whereas regular bypass rules instruct the browser about URLs that should *not*
|
|
use the proxy, this rule has the opposite effect and tells the browser to
|
|
instead *use* the proxy.
|
|
|
|
Ordering may matter when using a subtractive rule, as rules will be evaluated
|
|
in a left-to-right order. `<-loopback>;127.0.0.1` has a subtly different effect
|
|
than `127.0.0.1;<-loopback>`.
|
|
|
|
### Meaning of IP address range bypass rules
|
|
|
|
The IP address range bypass rules in manual proxy settings applies only to URL
|
|
literals. This is not what one would intuitively expect.
|
|
|
|
Example:
|
|
|
|
Say we have have configured a proxy for all requests, but added a bypass rule
|
|
for `192.168.0.0.1/16`. If we now navigate to `http://foo` (which resolves
|
|
to `192.168.1.5` in our setup) will the browser connect directly (bypass proxy)
|
|
because we have indicated a bypass rule that includes this IP?
|
|
|
|
It will go through the proxy.
|
|
|
|
The bypass rule in this case is not applicable, since the browser never
|
|
actually does a name resolution for `foo`. Proxy resolution happens before
|
|
name resolution, and depending on what proxy scheme is subsequently chosen,
|
|
client side name resolution may never be performed.
|
|
|
|
The usefulness of IP range proxy bypass rules is rather limited, as they only
|
|
apply to requests whose URL was explicitly an IP literal.
|
|
|
|
If proxy decisions need to be made based on the resolved IP address(es) of a
|
|
URL's hostname, one must use a PAC script.
|
|
|
|
## Implicit bypass rules
|
|
|
|
Requests to certain hosts will not be sent through a proxy, and will instead be
|
|
sent directly.
|
|
|
|
We call these the _implicit bypass rules_. The implicit bypass rules match URLs
|
|
whose host portion is either a localhost name or a link-local IP literal.
|
|
Essentially it matches:
|
|
|
|
```
|
|
localhost
|
|
*.localhost
|
|
[::1]
|
|
127.0.0.1/8
|
|
169.254/16
|
|
[FE80::]/10
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
The complete rules are slightly more complicated. For instance on
|
|
Windows we will also recognize `loopback`.
|
|
|
|
This concept of implicit proxy bypass rules is consistent with the
|
|
platform-level proxy support on Windows and macOS (albeit with some differences
|
|
due to their implementation quirks - see compatibility notes in
|
|
`net::ProxyBypassRules::MatchesImplicitRules`)
|
|
|
|
Why apply implicit proxy bypass rules in the first place? Certainly there are
|
|
considerations around ergonomics and user expectation, but the bigger problem
|
|
is security. Since the web platform treats `localhost` as a secure origin, the
|
|
ability to proxy it grants extra powers. This is [especially
|
|
problematic](https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=899126) when
|
|
proxy settings are externally controllable, as when using PAC scripts.
|
|
|
|
Historical support in Chrome:
|
|
|
|
* Prior to M71 there were no implicit proxy bypass rules, except if using
|
|
[`--winhttp-proxy-resolver`](#winhttp_proxy_resolver-command-line-switch).
|
|
* In M71 Chrome applied implicit proxy bypass rules to PAC scripts
|
|
* In M72 Chrome generalized the implicit proxy bypass rules to manually
|
|
configured proxies
|
|
|
|
### Overriding the implicit bypass rules
|
|
|
|
If you want traffic to `localhost` to be sent through a proxy despite the
|
|
security concerns, it can be done by adding the special proxy bypass rule
|
|
`<-loopback>`. This has the effect of _subtracting_ the implicit rules.
|
|
|
|
For instance, launch Chrome with the command line flag:
|
|
|
|
```
|
|
--proxy-bypass-list="<-loopback>"
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
Note that there currently is no mechanism to disable the implicit proxy bypass
|
|
rules when using a PAC script. Proxy bypass lists only apply to manual
|
|
settings, so the technique above cannot be used to let PAC scripts decide the
|
|
proxy for localhost URLs.
|
|
|
|
## Evaluating proxy lists (proxy fallback)
|
|
|
|
Proxy resolution results in a _list_ of [proxy server
|
|
identifiers](#Proxy-server-identifiers) to use for a
|
|
given request, not just a single proxy server identifier.
|
|
|
|
For instance, consider this PAC script:
|
|
|
|
```
|
|
function FindProxyForURL(url, host) {
|
|
if (host == "www.example.com") {
|
|
return "PROXY proxy1; HTTPS proxy2; SOCKS5 proxy3";
|
|
}
|
|
return "DIRECT";
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
What proxy will Chrome use for connections to `www.example.com`, given that
|
|
we have a choice of three separate proxy server identifiers to choose from
|
|
{`http://proxy1:80`, `https://proxy2:443`, `socks5://proxy3:1080`}?
|
|
|
|
Initially, Chrome will try the proxies in order. This means first attempting
|
|
the request through `http://proxy1:80`. If that "fails", the request is
|
|
next attempted through `https://proxy2:443`. Lastly if that fails, the
|
|
request is attempted through `socks5://proxy3:1080`.
|
|
|
|
This process is referred to as _proxy fallback_. What constitutes a
|
|
"failure" is described later.
|
|
|
|
Proxy fallback is stateful. The actual order of proxy attempts made be Chrome
|
|
is influenced by the past responsiveness of proxy servers.
|
|
|
|
Let's say we request `http://www.example.com/`. Per the PAC script this
|
|
resolves to a list of three proxy server identifiers:
|
|
|
|
{`http://proxy1:80`, `https://proxy2:443`, `socks5://proxy3:1080`}
|
|
|
|
Chrome will first attempt to issue the request through these proxies in the
|
|
left-to-right order.
|
|
|
|
Let's say that the attempt through `http://proxy1:80` fails, but then the
|
|
attempt through `https://proxy2:443` succeeds. Chrome will mark
|
|
`http://proxy1:80` as _bad_ for the next 5 minutes. Being marked as _bad_
|
|
means that `http://proxy1:80` is de-prioritized with respect to
|
|
other proxy server identifiers (including `direct://`) that are not marked as
|
|
bad.
|
|
|
|
That means the next time `http://www.example.com/` is requested, the effective
|
|
order for proxies to attempt will be:
|
|
|
|
{`https://proxy2:443`, `socks5://proxy3:1080`, `http://proxy1:80`}
|
|
|
|
Conceptually, _bad_ proxies are moved to the end of the list, rather than being
|
|
removed from consideration all together.
|
|
|
|
What constitutes a "failure" when it comes to triggering proxy fallback depends
|
|
on the proxy type. Generally speaking, only connection level failures
|
|
are deemed eligible for proxy fallback. This includes:
|
|
|
|
* Failure resolving the proxy server's DNS
|
|
* Failure connecting a TCP socket to the proxy server
|
|
|
|
(There are some caveats for how HTTPS and QUIC proxies count failures for
|
|
fallback)
|
|
|
|
Prior to M67, Chrome would consider failures establishing a
|
|
CONNECT tunnel as an error eligible for proxy fallback. This policy [resulted
|
|
in problems](https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=680837) for
|
|
deployments whose HTTP proxies intentionally failed certain https:// requests,
|
|
since that necessitates inducing a failure during the CONNECT tunnel
|
|
establishment. The problem would occur when a working proxy fallback option
|
|
like DIRECT was given, since the failing proxy would then be marked as bad.
|
|
|
|
Currently there are no options to configure proxy fallback (including disabling
|
|
the caching of bad proxies). Future versions of Chrome may [remove caching
|
|
of bad proxies](https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=936130)
|
|
to make fallback predictable.
|
|
|
|
To investigate issues relating to proxy fallback, one can [collect a NetLog
|
|
dump using
|
|
chrome://net-export/](https://dev.chromium.org/for-testers/providing-network-details).
|
|
These logs can then be loaded with the [NetLog
|
|
viewer](https://netlog-viewer.appspot.com/).
|
|
|
|
There are a few things of interest in the logs:
|
|
|
|
* The "Proxy" tab will show which proxies (if any) were marked as bad at the
|
|
time the capture ended.
|
|
* The "Events" tab notes what the resolved proxy list was, and what the
|
|
re-ordered proxy list was after taking into account bad proxies.
|
|
* The "Events" tab notes when a proxy is marked as bad and why (provided the
|
|
event occurred while capturing was enabled).
|
|
|
|
When debugging issues with bad proxies, it is also useful to reset Chrome's
|
|
cache of bad proxies. This can be done by clicking the "Clear bad proxies"
|
|
button on
|
|
[chrome://net-internals/#proxy](chrome://net-internals/#proxy). Note the UI
|
|
will not give feedback that the bad proxies were cleared, however capturing a
|
|
new NetLog dump can confirm it was cleared.
|
|
|
|
## Arguments passed to FindProxyForURL() in PAC scripts
|
|
|
|
PAC scripts in Chrome are expected to define a JavaScript function
|
|
`FindProxyForURL`.
|
|
|
|
The historical signature for this function is:
|
|
|
|
```
|
|
function FindProxyForURL(url, host) {
|
|
...
|
|
}
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
Scripts can expect to be called with string arguments `url` and `host` such
|
|
that:
|
|
|
|
* `url` is a *sanitized* version of the request's URL
|
|
* `host` is the unbracketed host portion of the origin.
|
|
|
|
Sanitization of the URL means that the path, query, fragment, and identity
|
|
portions of the URL are stripped. Effectively `url` will be
|
|
limited to a `scheme://host:port/` style URL
|
|
|
|
Examples of how `FindProxyForURL()` will be called:
|
|
|
|
```
|
|
// Actual URL: https://www.google.com/Foo
|
|
FindProxyForURL('https://www.google.com/', 'www.google.com')
|
|
|
|
// Actual URL: https://[dead::beef]/foo?bar
|
|
FindProxyForURL('https://[dead::beef]/', 'dead::beef')
|
|
|
|
// Actual URL: https://www.example.com:8080#search
|
|
FindProxyForURL('https://www.example.com:8080/', 'example.com')
|
|
|
|
// Actual URL: https://username:password@www.example.com
|
|
FindProxyForURL('https://www.example.com/', 'example.com')
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
Stripping the path and query from the `url` is a departure from the original
|
|
Netscape implementation of PAC. It was introduced in Chrome 52 for [security
|
|
reasons](https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=593759).
|
|
|
|
There is currently no option to turn off sanitization of URLs passed to PAC
|
|
scripts (removed in Chrome 75).
|
|
|
|
The sanitization of http:// URLs currently has a different policy, and does not
|
|
strip query and path portions of the URL. That said, users are advised not to
|
|
depend on reading the query/path portion of any URL
|
|
type, since future versions of Chrome may [deprecate that
|
|
capability](https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=882536) in
|
|
favor of a consistent policy.
|
|
|
|
## Resolving client's IP address within a PAC script using myIpAddress()
|
|
|
|
PAC scripts can invoke `myIpAddress()` to obtain the client's IP address. This
|
|
function returns a single IP literal, or `"127.0.0.1"` on failure.
|
|
|
|
This API is [inherently ambiguous when used on multi-homed
|
|
hosts](#myIpAddress_myIpAddressEx_and-multi_homed-hosts), as such hosts can
|
|
have multiple IP addresses and yet the browser can pick just one to return.
|
|
|
|
Chrome's algorithm for `myIpAddress()` favors returning the IP that would be
|
|
used if we were to connect to the public internet, by executing the following
|
|
ordered steps and short-circuiting once the first candidate IP is found:
|
|
|
|
1. Select the IP of an interface that can route to public Internet:
|
|
* Probe for route to `8.8.8.8`.
|
|
* Probe for route to `2001:4860:4860::8888`.
|
|
2. Select an IP by doing a DNS resolve of the machine's hostname:
|
|
* Select the first IPv4 result if there is one.
|
|
* Select the first IP result if there is one.
|
|
3. Select the IP of an interface that can route to private IP space:
|
|
* Probe for route to `10.0.0.0`.
|
|
* Probe for route to `172.16.0.0`.
|
|
* Probe for route to `192.168.0.0`.
|
|
* Probe for route to `FC00::`.
|
|
|
|
Note that when searching for candidate IP addresses, link-local and loopback
|
|
addresses are skipped over. Link-local or loopback address will only be returned as a
|
|
last resort when no other IP address was found by following these steps.
|
|
|
|
This sequence of steps explicitly favors IPv4 over IPv6 results, to match
|
|
Internet Explorer's IPv6 support.
|
|
|
|
*Historical note*: Prior to M72, Chrome's implementation of `myIpAddress()` was
|
|
effectively just `getaddrinfo(gethostname)`. This is now step 2 of the heuristic.
|
|
|
|
## Resolving client's IP address within a PAC script using myIpAddressEx()
|
|
|
|
Chrome supports the [Microsoft PAC
|
|
extension](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/desktop/winhttp/myipaddressex)
|
|
`myIpAddressEx()`.
|
|
|
|
This is like `myIpAddress()`, but instead of returning a single IP address, it
|
|
can return multiple IP addresses. It returns a string containing a semi-colon
|
|
separated list of addresses. On failure it returns an empty string to indicate
|
|
no results (whereas `myIpAddress()` returns `127.0.0.1`).
|
|
|
|
There are some differences with Chrome's implementation:
|
|
|
|
* In Chrome the function is unconditionally defined, whereas in Internet
|
|
Explorer one must have used the `FindProxyForURLEx` entrypoint.
|
|
* Chrome [does not necessarily enumerate all of the host's network
|
|
interfaces](#myIpAddress_myIpAddressEx_and-multi_homed-hosts)
|
|
* Chrome does not return link-local or loopback addresses (except if no other
|
|
addresses were found).
|
|
|
|
The algorithm that Chrome uses is nearly identical to that of `myIpAddress()`
|
|
described earlier, but in certain cases may return multiple IPs.
|
|
|
|
1. Select all the IPs of interfaces that can route to public Internet:
|
|
* Probe for route to `8.8.8.8`.
|
|
* Probe for route to `2001:4860:4860::8888`.
|
|
* If any IPs were found, return them, and finish.
|
|
2. Select an IP by doing a DNS resolve of the machine's hostname:
|
|
* If any IPs were found, return them, and finish.
|
|
3. Select the IP of an interface that can route to private IP space:
|
|
* Probe for route to `10.0.0.0`.
|
|
* Probe for route to `172.16.0.0`.
|
|
* Probe for route to `192.168.0.0`.
|
|
* Probe for route to `FC00::`.
|
|
* If any IPs were found, return them, and finish.
|
|
|
|
Note that short-circuiting happens whenever steps 1-3 find a candidate IP. So
|
|
for example if at least one IP address was discovered by checking routes to
|
|
public Internet, only those IPs will be returned, and steps 2-3 will not run.
|
|
|
|
## myIpAddress() / myIpAddressEx() and multi-homed hosts
|
|
|
|
`myIpAddress()` is a poor API for hosts that have multiple IP addresses, as it
|
|
can only return a single IP, which may or may not be the one you wanted. Both
|
|
`myIpAddress()` and `myIpAddressEx()` favor returning the IP for the interface
|
|
that would be used to route to the public internet.
|
|
|
|
As an API, `myIpAddressEx()` offers more flexibility since it can return
|
|
multiple IP addresses. However Chrome's implementation restricts which IPs a
|
|
PAC script can see [due to privacy
|
|
concerns](https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=905366). So
|
|
using `myIpAddressEx()` is not as powerful as enumerating all the host's IPs,
|
|
and may not address all use-cases.
|
|
|
|
A more reliable strategy for PAC scripts to check which network(s) a user is on
|
|
is to probe test domains using `dnsResolve()` / `dnsResolveEx()`.
|
|
|
|
Moreover, note that Chrome does not support the Firefox-specific
|
|
`pacUseMultihomedDNS` option, so adding that global to a PAC script has no
|
|
special side-effect in Chrome. Whereas in Firefox it reconfigures
|
|
`myIpAddress()` to be dependent on the target URL that `FindProxyForURL()` was
|
|
called with.
|
|
|
|
## Android quirks
|
|
|
|
Proxy resolving via PAC works differently on Android than other desktop Chrome
|
|
platforms:
|
|
|
|
* Android Chrome uses the same Chromium PAC resolver, however does not run it
|
|
out-of-process as on Desktop Chrome. This architectural difference is
|
|
due to the higher process cost on Android, and means Android Chrome is more
|
|
susceptible to malicious PAC scripts. The other consequence is that Android
|
|
Chrome can have distinct regressions from Desktop Chrome as the service setup
|
|
is quite different (and most `browser_tests` are not run on Android either).
|
|
|
|
* [WebView does not use Chrome's PAC
|
|
resolver](https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=989667).
|
|
Instead Android WebView uses the Android system's PAC resolver, which is less
|
|
optimized and uses an old build of V8. When the system is configured to use
|
|
PAC, Android WebView's net code will see the proxy settings as being a
|
|
single HTTP proxy on `localhost`. The system localhost proxy will in turn
|
|
evaluate the PAC script and forward the HTTP request on to the resolved
|
|
proxy. This translation has a number of effects, including what proxy
|
|
schemes are supported, the maximum connection limits, how proxy fallback
|
|
works, and overall performance (the current Android PAC evaluator blocks on
|
|
DNS).
|
|
|
|
* Android system log messages for `PacProcessor` are not related to Chrome or
|
|
its PAC evaluator. Rather, these are log messages generated by the Android
|
|
system's PAC implementation. This confusion can arise when users add
|
|
`alert()` to debug PAC script logic, and then refer to output in `logcat` to
|
|
try and diagnose a resolving issue in Android Chrome.
|
|
|
|
## Downloading PAC scripts
|
|
|
|
When a network context is configured to use a PAC script, proxy resolution will
|
|
stall while downloading the PAC script.
|
|
|
|
Fetches for PAC URLs are initiated by the network stack, and behave differently
|
|
from ordinary web visible requests:
|
|
|
|
* Must complete within 30 seconds.
|
|
* Must complete with an HTTP response code of exactly 200.
|
|
* Must have an uncompressed body smaller than 1 MB.
|
|
* Do not follow ordinary HTTP caching semantics.
|
|
* Are never fetched through a proxy
|
|
* Are not visible to the WebRequest extension API, or to service workers.
|
|
* Do not support HTTP authentication (ambient authentication may work, but
|
|
cannot prompt UI for credentials).
|
|
* Do not support client certificates (including `AutoSelectCertificateForUrls`)
|
|
* Do not support auxiliary certificate network fetches (will only used cached
|
|
OCSP, AIA, and CRL responses during certificate verification).
|
|
|
|
### Caching of successful PAC fetches
|
|
|
|
PAC URLs are always fetched from the network, and never from the HTTP cache.
|
|
After a PAC URL is successfully fetched, its contents (which are used to create
|
|
a long-lived Java Script context) will be assumed to be fresh until either:
|
|
|
|
* The network changes (IP address changes, DNS configuration changes)
|
|
* The response becomes older than 12 hours
|
|
* A user explicitly invalidates PAC through `chrome://net-internals#proxy`
|
|
|
|
Once considered stale, the PAC URL will be re-fetched the next time proxy
|
|
resolution is requested.
|
|
|
|
### Fallback for failed PAC fetches
|
|
|
|
When the proxy settings are configured to use a PAC URL, and that PAC URL
|
|
cannot be fetched, proxy resolution will fallback to the next option, which is
|
|
often `DIRECT`:
|
|
|
|
* If using system proxy settings, and the platform supports fallback to manual
|
|
proxy settings (e.g. Windows), the specified manual proxy servers will be
|
|
used after the PAC fetch fails.
|
|
* If using Chrome's proxy settings, and the PAC script was marked as
|
|
[mandatory](https://developer.chrome.com/extensions/proxy), fallback to
|
|
`DIRECT` is not permitted. Subsequent network requests will fail proxy
|
|
resolution and complete with `ERR_MANDATORY_PROXY_CONFIGURATION_FAILED`.
|
|
* Otherwise proxy resolution will silently fall back to `DIRECT`.
|
|
|
|
### Recovering from failed PAC fetches
|
|
|
|
When fetching an explicitly configured PAC URL fails, the browser will try to
|
|
re-fetch it:
|
|
|
|
* In exactly 8 seconds
|
|
* 32 seconds after that
|
|
* 2 minutes after that
|
|
* Every 4 hours thereafter
|
|
|
|
This background polling of the PAC URL is only initiated in response to an
|
|
incoming proxy resolution request, so it will not trigger work when the browser
|
|
is otherwise idle.
|
|
|
|
Similarly to successful fetches, the PAC URL will be also be re-fetched
|
|
whenever the network changes, the proxy settings change, or it was manually
|
|
invalidated via `chrome://net-internals#proxy`.
|
|
|
|
### Text encoding
|
|
|
|
Note that UTF-8 is *not* the default interpretation of PAC response bodies.
|
|
|
|
The priority for encoding is determined in this order:
|
|
|
|
1. The `charset` property of the HTTP response's `Content-Type`
|
|
2. Any BOM at the start of response body
|
|
3. Otherwise defaults to ISO-8859-1.
|
|
|
|
When setting the `Content-Type`, servers should prefer using a mime type of
|
|
`application/x-ns-proxy-autoconfig` or `application/x-javascript-config`.
|
|
However in practice, Chrome does not enforce the mime type.
|
|
|
|
## Capturing a Net Log for debugging proxy resolution issues
|
|
|
|
Issues in proxy resolution are best investigated using a Net Log.
|
|
|
|
A good starting point is to follow the [general instructions for
|
|
net-export](https://www.chromium.org/for-testers/providing-network-details),
|
|
*and while the Net Log is being captured perform these steps*:
|
|
|
|
1. Reproduce the failure (ex: load a URL that fails)
|
|
2. If you can reproduce a success, do so (ex: load a different URL that succeeds).
|
|
3. In a new tab, navigate to `chrome://net-internals/#proxy` and click both
|
|
buttons ("Re-apply settings" and "Clear bad proxies").
|
|
4. Repeat step (1)
|
|
5. Stop the Net Log and save the file.
|
|
|
|
The resulting Net Log should have enough information to diagnose common
|
|
problems. It can be attached to a bug report, or explored using the [Net Log
|
|
Viewer](https://netlog-viewer.appspot.com/). See the next section for some tips
|
|
on analyzing it.
|
|
|
|
## Analyzing Net Logs for proxy issues
|
|
|
|
Load saved Net Logs using [Net Log Viewer](https://netlog-viewer.appspot.com/).
|
|
|
|
### Proxy overview tab
|
|
|
|
Start by getting a big-picture view of the proxy settings by clicking to the
|
|
"Proxy" tab on the left. This summarizes the proxy settings at the time the
|
|
_capture ended_.
|
|
|
|
* Does the _original_ proxy settings match expectation?
|
|
The proxy settings might be coming from:
|
|
* Managed Chrome policy (chrome://policy)
|
|
* Command line flags (ex: `--proxy-server`)
|
|
* (per-profile) Chrome extensions (ex: [chrome.proxy](https://developer.chrome.com/extensions/proxy))
|
|
* (per-network) System proxy settings
|
|
|
|
* Was [proxy autodetect (WPAD)](#Web-Proxy-Auto_Discovery-WPAD) specified? In
|
|
this case the final URL probed will be reflected by the difference between
|
|
the "Effective" and "Original" settings.
|
|
|
|
* Internally, proxy settings are per-NetworkContext. The proxy
|
|
overview tab shows settings for a *particular* NetworkContext, namely the
|
|
one associated with the Profile used to navigate to `chrome://net-export`. For
|
|
instance if the net-export was initiated from an Incognito window, it may
|
|
show different proxy settings here than a net-export capture initiated by a
|
|
non-Incognito window. When the net-export was triggered from command line
|
|
(`--log-net-log`) no particular NetworkContext is associated with the
|
|
capture and hence no proxy settings will be shown in this overview.
|
|
|
|
* Were any proxies marked as bad?
|
|
|
|
### Import tab
|
|
|
|
Skim through the Import tab and look for relevant command line flags and active
|
|
field trials. A find-in-page for `proxy` is a good starting point. Be on the lookout for
|
|
[`--winhttp-proxy-resolver`](#winhttp_proxy_resolver-command-line-switch) which
|
|
has [known problems](https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=644030).
|
|
|
|
### Events tab
|
|
|
|
To deep dive into proxy resolution, switch to the Events tab.
|
|
|
|
You can start by filtering on `type:URL_REQUEST` to see all the top level
|
|
requests, and then keep click through the dependency links to
|
|
trace the proxy resolution steps and outcome.
|
|
|
|
The most relevant events have either `PROXY_`, `PAC_`, or
|
|
`WPAD_` in their names. You can also try filtering for each of those.
|
|
|
|
Documentation on specific events is available in
|
|
[net_log_event_type_list.h](https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/HEAD/net/log/net_log_event_type_list.h).
|
|
|
|
Network change events can also be key to understanding proxy issues. After
|
|
switching networks (ex VPN), the effective proxy settings, as well as content
|
|
of any PAC scripts/auto-detect can change.
|
|
|
|
## Web Proxy Auto-Discovery (WPAD)
|
|
|
|
When configured to use WPAD (aka "autotmaticaly detect proxy settings"), Chrome
|
|
will prioritize:
|
|
|
|
1. DHCP-based WPAD (option 252)
|
|
2. DNS-based WPAD
|
|
|
|
These are tried in order, however DHCP-based WPAD is only supported for Chrome
|
|
on Windows and Chrome on Chrome OS.
|
|
|
|
WPAD is the system default for many home and Enterprise users.
|
|
|
|
### Chrome on macOS support for DHCP-based WPAD
|
|
|
|
Chrome on macOS does not support DHCP-based WPAD when configured to use
|
|
"autodetect".
|
|
|
|
However, macOS might perform DHCP-based WPAD and embed this discovered PAC URL
|
|
as part of the system proxy settings. So effectively when Chrome is configured
|
|
to "use system proxy settings" it may behave as if it supports DHCP-based WPAD.
|
|
|
|
### Dangers of DNS-based WPAD and DNS search suffix list
|
|
|
|
DNS-based WPAD involves probing for the non-FQDN `wpad`. This means
|
|
WPAD's performance and security is directly tied to the user's DNS search
|
|
suffix list.
|
|
|
|
When resolving `wpad`, the host's DNS resolver will complete the hostname using
|
|
each of the suffixes in the search list:
|
|
|
|
1. If the suffix list is long this process can very slow, as it triggers a
|
|
cascade of NXDOMAIN.
|
|
2. If the suffix list includes domains *outside of the administrative domain*,
|
|
WPAD may select an attacker controlled PAC server, and can subsequently
|
|
funnel the user's traffic through a proxy server of their choice. The
|
|
evolution of TLDs further increases this risk, since what were previously
|
|
private suffixes used by an enterprise can become publicly registerable.
|
|
See also [WPAD Name Collision
|
|
Vulnerability](https://www.us-cert.gov/ncas/alerts/TA16-144A)
|
|
|
|
## --winhttp-proxy-resolver command line switch
|
|
|
|
Passing the `--winhttp-proxy-resolver` command line argument instructs Chrome
|
|
to use the system libraries for *one narrow part of proxy resolution*: evaluating
|
|
a given PAC script.
|
|
|
|
Use of this flag is NOT a supported mode, and has [known
|
|
problems](https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=644030): It
|
|
can break Chrome extensions (`chrome.proxy` API), the interpretation of
|
|
Proxy policies, hurt performance, and doesn't ensure full fidelity
|
|
interpretation of system proxy settings.
|
|
|
|
Another oddity of this switch is that it actually gets interpreted with a
|
|
smilar meaning on other platforms (macOS), despite its Windows-specific naming.
|
|
|
|
This flag was historically exposed for debugging, and to mitigate unresolved
|
|
policy differences in PAC execution. In the future this switch [will be
|
|
removed](https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=644030).
|
|
|
|
Although Chrome would like full fidelity with Windows proxy settings, there are
|
|
limits to those integrations. Dependencies like NRPT for proxy
|
|
resolution necessitate using Windows proxy resolution libraries directly
|
|
instead of Chrome's. We hope these less common use cases will be fully
|
|
addressed by [this
|
|
feature](https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=1032820)
|